217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27630188)
1. Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial.
Gale C; Hyde MJ; Modi N;
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2017 Jul; 102(4):F291-F298. PubMed ID: 27630188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
Modi N
Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The WHEAT pilot trial-WithHolding Enteral feeds Around packed red cell Transfusion to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in preterm neonates: a multicentre, electronic patient record (EPR), randomised controlled point-of-care pilot trial.
Gale C; Modi N; Jawad S; Culshaw L; Dorling J; Bowler U; Forster A; King A; McLeish J; Linsell L; Turner MA; Robberts H; Stanbury K; van Staa T; Juszczak E
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e033543. PubMed ID: 31542771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges of a simplified opt-out consent process in a neonatal randomised controlled trial: qualitative study of parents' and health professionals' views and experiences.
McLeish J; Alderdice F; Robberts H; Cole C; Dorling J; Gale C;
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2021 May; 106(3):244-250. PubMed ID: 33139313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.
Dixon-Woods M; Foy C; Hayden C; Al-Shahi Salman R; Tebbutt S; Schroter S
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011973. PubMed ID: 27580832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines.
Strode AE; Singh PP; Slack CM; Wassenaar DR
S Afr Med J; 2018 Oct; 108(10):828-832. PubMed ID: 30421709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Public involvement could usefully inform ethical review, but rarely does: what are the implications?
Staley K; Elliott J
Res Involv Engagem; 2017; 3():30. PubMed ID: 29238613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic lavage in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a mixed methods study of the feasibility of conducting a surgical placebo-controlled trial (the KORAL study).
Campbell MK; Skea ZC; Sutherland AG; Cuthbertson BH; Entwistle VA; McDonald AM; Norrie JD; Carlson RV; Bridgman S;
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jan; 14(5):1-180. PubMed ID: 20113674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nature and extent of changes in the patient's information sheets of international multicentre clinical trials as requested by Spanish Research Ethics Committees.
Dal-Ré R; Morejón E; Ortega R
Med Clin (Barc); 2004 Dec; 123(20):770-4. PubMed ID: 15607068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative consent methods used in the multinational, pragmatic, randomised clinical trial SafeBoosC-III.
Vestager ML; Hansen ML; Greisen G;
Trials; 2024 Apr; 25(1):236. PubMed ID: 38575977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition.
Lammons W; Moss B; Battersby C; Cornelius V; Babalis D; Modi N
BMJ Paediatr Open; 2021; 5(1):e001112. PubMed ID: 34212120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers.
Shearman K; Masters A; Nutt D; Bowman S; Draper H
BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e055208. PubMed ID: 35715186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
Angell E; Biggs H; Gahleitner F; Dixon-Woods M
Arch Dis Child; 2010 Nov; 95(11):915-7. PubMed ID: 20573742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SUPPORT and the Ethics of Study Implementation: Lessons for Comparative Effectiveness Research from the Trial of Oxygen Therapy for Premature Babies.
Lantos JD; Feudtner C
Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 25530316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Death, bereavement and randomised controlled trials (BRACELET): a methodological study of policy and practice in neonatal and paediatric intensive care trials.
Snowdon C; Brocklehurst P; Tasker R; Ward Platt M; Harvey S; Elbourne D
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Jul; 18(42):1-410. PubMed ID: 24987820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Varieties of standard-of-care treatment randomized trials: ethical implications.
Kim SY; Miller FG
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(9):895-6. PubMed ID: 25591061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ranking Research Methodology by Risk - a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members.
Kolstoe SE; Durning J; Yost J; Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S
Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):154. PubMed ID: 37658420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Routine gastric residual volume measurement to guide enteral feeding in mechanically ventilated infants and children: the GASTRIC feasibility study.
Tume LN; Woolfall K; Arch B; Roper L; Deja E; Jones AP; Latten L; Pathan N; Eccleson H; Hickey H; Parslow R; Preston J; Beissel A; Andrzejewska I; Gale C; Valla FV; Dorling J
Health Technol Assess; 2020 May; 24(23):1-120. PubMed ID: 32458797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
