203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27630991)
1. dMM-PBSA: A New HADDOCK Scoring Function for Protein-Peptide Docking.
Spiliotopoulos D; Kastritis PL; Melquiond AS; Bonvin AM; Musco G; Rocchia W; Spitaleri A
Front Mol Biosci; 2016; 3():46. PubMed ID: 27630991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes.
Weng G; Wang E; Chen F; Sun H; Wang Z; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 May; 21(19):10135-10145. PubMed ID: 31062799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking.
Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the performance of MM/PBSA for binding affinity prediction using class A GPCR crystal structures.
Yau MQ; Emtage AL; Chan NJY; Doughty SW; Loo JSE
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 May; 33(5):487-496. PubMed ID: 30989574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors.
Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 8. Predicting binding free energies and poses of protein-RNA complexes.
Chen F; Sun H; Wang J; Zhu F; Liu H; Wang Z; Lei T; Li Y; Hou T
RNA; 2018 Sep; 24(9):1183-1194. PubMed ID: 29930024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA.
Wang J; Morin P; Wang W; Kollman PA
J Am Chem Soc; 2001 Jun; 123(22):5221-30. PubMed ID: 11457384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the usefulness of ion-mobility mass spectrometry and SAXS data in scoring docking decoys.
Karaca E; Bonvin AM
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2013 May; 69(Pt 5):683-94. PubMed ID: 23633577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrete molecular dynamics distinguishes nativelike binding poses from decoys in difficult targets.
Proctor EA; Yin S; Tropsha A; Dokholyan NV
Biophys J; 2012 Jan; 102(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 22225808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HADDOCK(2P2I): a biophysical model for predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein interaction inhibitors.
Kastritis PL; Rodrigues JP; Bonvin AM
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):826-36. PubMed ID: 24521147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sense and simplicity in HADDOCK scoring: Lessons from CASP-CAPRI round 1.
Vangone A; Rodrigues JP; Xue LC; van Zundert GC; Geng C; Kurkcuoglu Z; Nellen M; Narasimhan S; Karaca E; van Dijk M; Melquiond AS; Visscher KM; Trellet M; Kastritis PL; Bonvin AM
Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):417-423. PubMed ID: 27802573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring.
Sun H; Li Y; Shen M; Tian S; Xu L; Pan P; Guan Y; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Oct; 16(40):22035-45. PubMed ID: 25205360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PBSA_E: A PBSA-Based Free Energy Estimator for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity.
Liu X; Liu J; Zhu T; Zhang L; He X; Zhang JZ
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 May; 56(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 27088302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Properties that rank protein:protein docking poses with high accuracy.
Simões ICM; Coimbra JTS; Neves RPP; Costa IPD; Ramos MJ; Fernandes PA
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Aug; 20(32):20927-20942. PubMed ID: 30067268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
