455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27631647)
1. Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.
Confalonieri N; Biazzo A; Cerveri P; Pullen C; Manzotti A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3507-3516. PubMed ID: 27631647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Joskowicz L; Pearle AD
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3482-3495. PubMed ID: 27600634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?
Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():63-7. PubMed ID: 17589366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study.
Todesca A; Garro L; Penna M; Bejui-Hugues J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jun; 25(6):1778-1783. PubMed ID: 27306985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Xu K; Chen Q; Yan Q; Wang Q; Sun J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 17(1):123. PubMed ID: 35209906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical, radiological and survivorship results after ten years comparing navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis.
Baier C; Wolfsteiner J; Otto F; Zeman F; Renkawitz T; Springorum HR; Maderbacher G; Grifka J
Int Orthop; 2017 Oct; 41(10):2037-2044. PubMed ID: 28550426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Lee DY; Park YJ; Hwang SC; Park JS; Kang DG
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Oct; 28(10):3183-3192. PubMed ID: 31784782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-Term Results of Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasties Performed by Low-Volume and Less Experienced Surgeon].
Lacko M; Schreierová D; Čellár R; Vaško G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(3):219-225. PubMed ID: 30257783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Computer-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Rhee SJ; Kim HJ; Lee CR; Kim CW; Gwak HC; Kim JH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Oct; 101(20):1875-1885. PubMed ID: 31626013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Hetaimish BM; Khan MM; Simunovic N; Al-Harbi HH; Bhandari M; Zalzal PK
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1177-82. PubMed ID: 22333865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jun; 99(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28632587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for patients with retained implants in the femur.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Huang PJ; Fu YC; Huang HT
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Aug; 30(8):415-21. PubMed ID: 25002380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femur bowing could be a risk factor for implant flexion in conventional total knee arthroplasty and notching in navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Ko JH; Han CD; Shin KH; Nguku L; Yang IH; Lee WS; Kim KI; Park KK
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2476-82. PubMed ID: 26581366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Computer Assisted Navigation Improve Functional Outcomes and Implant Survivability after Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Roberts TD; Clatworthy MG; Frampton CM; Young SW
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):59-63. PubMed ID: 26138516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-navigated revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Chatain F; Denjean S; Delalande JL; Chavane H; Bejui-Hugues J; Guyen O
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6):720-7. PubMed ID: 22939772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population-based Survivorship of Computer-navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Antonios JK; Kang HP; Robertson D; Oakes DA; Lieberman JR; Heckmann ND
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Oct; 28(20):857-864. PubMed ID: 31934926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer navigation systems in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Nair R; Tripathy G; Deysine GR
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Jun; 43(6):256-61. PubMed ID: 24945474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
