399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27631828)
1. Audiometric Comparison Between the First Patients With the Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant and Matched Percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Device Users.
Rigato C; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Jansson KJ; Hol MK; Eeg-Olofsson M
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1381-7. PubMed ID: 27631828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Year Follow-Up with the Bone Conduction Implant.
Persson AC; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Rigato C; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(5):263-275. PubMed ID: 32268333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss.
Gerdes T; Salcher RB; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 27093021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.
Schmerber S; Deguine O; Marx M; Van de Heyning P; Sterkers O; Mosnier I; Garin P; Godey B; Vincent C; Venail F; Mondain M; Deveze A; Lavieille JP; Karkas A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 274(4):1835-1851. PubMed ID: 27475796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcutaneous bone conductive implants in patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss: audiological outcomes in noise condition.
Magliulo G; Iannella G; De Vincentiis M; Turchetta R; Portanova G; Angeletti D; Mancini P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):822-829. PubMed ID: 29939073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcutaneous Bone-anchored Hearing Aids Versus Percutaneous Ones: Multicenter Comparative Clinical Study.
Iseri M; Orhan KS; Tuncer U; Kara A; Durgut M; Guldiken Y; Surmelioglu O
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):849-53. PubMed ID: 25730451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Bonebridge BCI 602 active bone conductive implant in adults: efficacy and stability of audiological, surgical, and functional outcomes.
Cywka KB; Skarzynski PH; Krol B; Hatzopoulos S; Skarzynski H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 279(7):3525-3534. PubMed ID: 35182185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss.
Barbara M; Perotti M; Gioia B; Volpini L; Monini S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 133(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 23768011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.
Alzhrani F
Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and precision of direct bone conduction measurements.
Sadeghi AM; Flynn M; Davison T; Schulte M; Hillbratt M
B-ENT; 2016; 12(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27097393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term follow-up and review of the Bone Conduction Implant.
Reinfeldt S; Eeg-Olofsson M; Fredén Jansson KJ; Persson AC; Håkansson B
Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 421():108503. PubMed ID: 35490057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audiological assessment with Matrix sentence test of percutaneous vs transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: a pilot study.
Portelli D; Ciodaro F; Loteta S; Alberti G; Bruno R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Sep; 280(9):4065-4072. PubMed ID: 36933021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone conduction implants for amplification: comparison of results.
Hough DA; Matthews P; Hough JV
Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Dec; 76(12):857, 861-2, 864-5. PubMed ID: 9431774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Bonebridge in Adults with Mixed and Conductive Hearing Loss: Audiological and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Skarżyński PH; Ratuszniak A; Król B; Kozieł M; Osińska K; Cywka KB; Sztabnicka A; Skarżyński H
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(2):90-99. PubMed ID: 31141814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
