These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27631988)

  • 1. On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques.
    Hoffmann A; Waubert de Puiseau B; Schmidt AF; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1470-1483. PubMed ID: 27631988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the validity of two indirect questioning techniques: A Stochastic Lie Detector versus the Crosswise Model.
    Hoffmann A; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1032-46. PubMed ID: 26182857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235403. PubMed ID: 32603352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do they really wash their hands? Prevalence estimates for personal hygiene behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic based on indirect questions.
    Mieth L; Mayer MM; Hoffmann A; Buchner A; Bell R
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 33397344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.
    Heck DW; Hoffmann A; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1895-1905. PubMed ID: 28916924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of Lifetime Extradyadic Sex Using a Hybrid of Randomized Response Technique and Crosswise Design.
    Tu SH; Hsieh SH
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 27164895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model.
    Höglinger M; Jann B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201770. PubMed ID: 30106973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the validity of non-randomized response techniques: an experimental comparison of the crosswise model and the triangular model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1768-1782. PubMed ID: 32185638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258603. PubMed ID: 34714838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model.
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243384. PubMed ID: 33284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy and patient-clergy access: perspectives of patients admitted to hospital.
    Erde E; Pomerantz SC; Saccocci M; Kramer-Feeley V; Cavalieri TA
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Jul; 32(7):398-402. PubMed ID: 16816039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trust Model for Protection of Personal Health Data in a Global Environment.
    Ruotsalainen P; Blobel B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():202-206. PubMed ID: 29295082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental validation of specialized questioning techniques in conservation.
    Ibbett H; Dorward L; Dwiyahreni AA; Jones JPG; Kaduma J; Kohi EM; Mchomvu J; Prayitno K; Sabiladiyni H; Sankeni S; Saputra AW; Supriatna J; St John FAV
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13908. PubMed ID: 35288991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public attitudes toward health information exchange: perceived benefits and concerns.
    Dimitropoulos L; Patel V; Scheffler SA; Posnack S
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 Dec; 17(12 Spec No.):SP111-6. PubMed ID: 22216769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adolescents with cancer on privacy: Fact-finding survey on the need for confidentiality and space.
    Silva M; Barretta F; Luksch R; Terenziani M; Casanova M; Spreafico F; Meazza C; Podda M; Biassoni V; Schiavello E; Chiaravalli S; Puma N; Bergamaschi L; Gattuso G; Sironi G; Adduci A; Grampa P; Massimino M; Ferrari A
    Tumori; 2021 Oct; 107(5):452-457. PubMed ID: 33509050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries.
    Petersen I; Desmedt C; Harris A; Buffa F; Kollek R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 25746784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Privacy effects on self-reported drug use: interactions with survey mode and respondent characteristics.
    Aquilino WS
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 167():383-415. PubMed ID: 9243571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trust Me, I'm a Doctor: Examining Changes in How Privacy Concerns Affect Patient Withholding Behavior.
    Walker DM; Johnson T; Ford EW; Huerta TR
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):e2. PubMed ID: 28052843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining individuals' adoption of healthcare wearable devices: An empirical study from privacy calculus perspective.
    Li H; Wu J; Gao Y; Shi Y
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Apr; 88():8-17. PubMed ID: 26878757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived liveliness and speech comprehensibility in aphasia: the effects of direct speech in auditory narratives.
    Groenewold R; Bastiaanse R; Nickels L; Huiskes M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014; 49(4):486-97. PubMed ID: 24655365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.