These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27632255)

  • 1. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading.
    Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
    Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of three types of abutments on preload values before and after cyclic loading with structural analysis by scanning electron microscopy.
    Butignon LE; Basilio Mde A; Pereira Rde P; Arioli Filho JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e161-70. PubMed ID: 23748335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling.
    Jorge JR; Barao VA; Delben JA; Assuncao WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 23527343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abutments with reduced diameter for both cement and screw retentions: analysis of failure modes and misfit of abutment-crown-connections after cyclic loading.
    Moris IC; Faria AC; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):432-436. PubMed ID: 26923302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.
    Yilmaz B; Çakmak G; Batak B; Johnston WM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 33938119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
    Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Abutment Collar Length Affect Abutment Screw Loosening After Cyclic Loading?
    Siadat H; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():346-51. PubMed ID: 26237093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
    Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 25976709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments.
    Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Vaziri S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e224-30. PubMed ID: 22376004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants.
    Park JM; Baek CH; Heo SJ; Kim SK; Koak JY; Kim SK; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 28291853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in micromorphology of the implant-abutment junction for original and third-party abutments on a representative dental implant.
    Fokas G; Ma L; Chronopoulos V; Janda M; Mattheos N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 30006227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of cyclic load on vertical misfit of prefabricated and cast implant single abutment.
    Jesus Tavarez RR; Bonachela WC; Xible AA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21437464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of inter-joined zirconia abutment of dental implant system with injection molding technique.
    Yang J; Wang K; Liu G; Wang D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1247-50. PubMed ID: 22809060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
    Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
    Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.