312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27632273)
1. The Influence of Crown-to-Implant Ratio on Short Implant Marginal Bone Loss.
Nunes M; Almeida RF; Felino AC; Malo P; de Araújo Nobre M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1156-63. PubMed ID: 27632273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss.
Anitua E; Piñas L; Orive G
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 23656303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Influence of Prosthesis Design on the Outcomes of Tooth Implants Immediately Placed and Loaded by Means of One-Piece Titanium Machined Restoration.
Toti P; Marconcini S; Enrica G; Pedretti G; Barone A; Covani U
J Oral Implantol; 2018 Apr; 44(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 29182488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short threaded implants with an oxidized surface to restore posterior teeth: 1- to 3-year results of a prospective study.
De Santis D; Cucchi A; Longhi C; Vincenzo B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 21483893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: a 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study.
Fischer K; Bäckström M; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 18384399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the crown-to-implant length ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting single crown restorations: a cross-sectional retrospective 5-year investigation.
Schneider D; Witt L; Hämmerle CHF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 21689162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does crown/implant ratio influence the survival and marginal bone level of short single implants in the mandibular molar? A preliminary investigation consisting of 12 patients.
Ghariani L; Segaan L; Rayyan MM; Galli S; Jimbo R; Ibrahim A
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Feb; 43(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 26333185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers.
Hälg GA; Schmid J; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):983-90. PubMed ID: 18828813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of Crown-to-Implant Ratio on Long-Term Marginal Bone Loss Around Short Implants.
Di Fiore A; Vigolo P; Sivolella S; Cavallin F; Katsoulis J; Monaco C; Stellini E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):992–998. PubMed ID: 30779823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short vs. Standard Laser-Microgrooved Implants Supporting Single and Splinted Crowns: A Prospective Study with 3 Years Follow-Up.
Guarnieri R; Di Nardo D; Gaimari G; Miccoli G; Testarelli L
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e771-e779. PubMed ID: 30168651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome.
Peñarrocha M; Viña JA; Carrillo C; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):e322-30. PubMed ID: 22538025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complete Edentulous Rehabilitation Using an Immediate Function Protocol and an Implant Design Featuring a Straight Body, Anodically Oxidized Surface, and Narrow Tip with Engaging Threads Extending to the Apex of the Implant: A 5-year Retrospective Clinical Study.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Lopes A; Ferro A; Gravito I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 26800172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year post-loading results of a randomised, controlled, split-mouth trial comparing implants with different prosthetic interfaces and design in partially posterior edentulous mandibles.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Moy PK
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 24892113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss.
Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):707-14. PubMed ID: 17697000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.
Balmer M; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):290-299. PubMed ID: 29330869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study.
Aglietta M; Iorio Siciliano V; Blasi A; Sculean A; Brägger U; Lang NP; Salvi GE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 22250868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-year treatment outcomes with three brands of implants placed in the posterior maxilla and mandible of partially edentulous patients.
Ozkan Y; Ozcan M; Akoglu B; Ucankale M; Kulak-Ozkan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17341375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Marginal Peri-implant Bone-Level Short-Length Implants Compared with Standard Implants Supporting Single Crowns in a Controlled Clinical Trial: 12-Month Follow-up.
Mendoza-Azpur G; Lau M; Valdivia E; Rojas J; Muñoz H; Nevins M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36(6):791-795. PubMed ID: 27740639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants: 1- to 6-year data.
Mangano C; Mangano F; Shibli JA; Tettamanti L; Figliuzzi M; d'Avila S; Sammons RL; Piattelli A
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 20653436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.
Clelland N; Chaudhry J; Rashid RG; McGlumphy E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27632270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
