393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27632411)
1. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tuuli MG; Rampersad RM; Carbone JF; Stamilio D; Macones GA; Odibo AO
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.
Fox NS; Melka S; Miller J; Bender S; Silverstein M; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of skin coverage method following subcuticular suturing on wound infection rates at cesarean delivery
Westcott JM; Crockett L; Qiu F; Berg TG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(16):2003-2005. PubMed ID: 27624413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
