These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27632530)

  • 1. [Improvement in Phoneme Discrimination in Noise in Normal Hearing Adults].
    Schumann A; Garea Garcia L; Hoppe U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Feb; 96(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 27632530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
    Schumann A; Serman M; Gefeller O; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.
    Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 18367694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microscopic prediction of speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing in noise using an auditory model.
    Jürgens T; Brand T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2635-48. PubMed ID: 19894841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Phoneme discrimination training with experienced cochlear implant listeners].
    Schumann A; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Oct; 64(10):751-8. PubMed ID: 27495314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of intonation contours for speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Grugel L; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL204-9. PubMed ID: 21568376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory Training Effects on the Listening Skills of Children With Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Loo JH; Rosen S; Bamiou DE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 26418044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits of phoneme discrimination training in a randomized controlled trial of 50- to 74-year-olds with mild hearing loss.
    Ferguson MA; Henshaw H; Clark DP; Moore DR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):e110-21. PubMed ID: 24752284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program.
    Tyler RS; Witt SA; Dunn CC; Wang W
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):390-403. PubMed ID: 20701836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developmental effects and spatial hearing in young children with normal-hearing sensitivity.
    Schafer EC; Beeler S; Ramos H; Morais M; Monzingo J; Algier K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e32-43. PubMed ID: 22688920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; Ellis EM; Baltzell LS; McMillan GP
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26989823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.