426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27632816)
1. A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Rivero-Arias O; Tsiachristas A; Cruickshank M; Gray A; Brabin L; Torgerson D; Crosbie EJ; Sargent A; Roberts C
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Sep; 20(68):1-138. PubMed ID: 27632816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cluster randomized trial of strategies to increase uptake amongst young women invited for their first cervical screen: The STRATEGIC trial.
Kitchener H; Gittins M; Cruickshank M; Moseley C; Fletcher S; Albrow R; Gray A; Brabin L; Torgerson D; Crosbie EJ; Sargent A; Roberts C
J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 28530513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
Tsiachristas A; Gittins M; Kitchener H; Gray A
J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 28530515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Start2quit: a randomised clinical controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using personal tailored risk information and taster sessions to increase the uptake of the NHS Stop Smoking Services.
Gilbert H; Sutton S; Morris R; Petersen I; Wu Q; Parrott S; Galton S; Kale D; Magee MS; Gardner L; Nazareth I
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jan; 21(3):1-206. PubMed ID: 28121288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tackling obesity in areas of high social deprivation: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a task-based weight management group programme - a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
McRobbie H; Hajek P; Peerbux S; Kahan BC; Eldridge S; Trépel D; Parrott S; Griffiths C; Snuggs S; Myers Smith K
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Oct; 20(79):1-150. PubMed ID: 27802843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomised controlled trial and economic analysis of an internet-based weight management programme: POWeR+ (Positive Online Weight Reduction).
Little P; Stuart B; Hobbs FR; Kelly J; Smith ER; Bradbury KJ; Hughes S; Smith PW; Moore MV; Lean ME; Margetts BM; Byrne CD; Griffin S; Davoudianfar M; Hooper J; Yao G; Zhu S; Raftery J; Yardley L
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jan; 21(4):1-62. PubMed ID: 28122658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CollAborative care and active surveillance for Screen-Positive EldeRs with subthreshold depression (CASPER): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Lewis H; Adamson J; Atherton K; Bailey D; Birtwistle J; Bosanquet K; Clare E; Delgadillo J; Ekers D; Foster D; Gabe R; Gascoyne S; Haley L; Hargate R; Hewitt C; Holmes J; Keding A; Lilley-Kelly A; Maya J; McMillan D; Meer S; Meredith J; Mitchell N; Nutbrown S; Overend K; Pasterfield M; Richards D; Spilsbury K; Torgerson D; Traviss-Turner G; Trépel D; Woodhouse R; Ziegler F; Gilbody S
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Feb; 21(8):1-196. PubMed ID: 28248154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls prevention in older people: a multicentre cohort randomised controlled trial (the REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention trial).
Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Green L; Fairhurst C; Adamson J; Scantlebury A; Corbacho B; Hewitt CE; Hicks K; Hull R; Keenan AM; Lamb SE; McIntosh C; Menz HB; Redmond A; Richardson Z; Vernon W; Watson J; Torgerson DJ
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Apr; 21(24):1-198. PubMed ID: 28621259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.
Stephenson J; Bailey JV; Blandford A; Brima N; Copas A; D'Souza P; Gubijev A; Hunter R; Shawe J; Rait G; Oliver S
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Nov; 24(56):1-44. PubMed ID: 33164729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferences for interventions designed to increase cervical screening uptake in non-attending young women: How findings from a discrete choice experiment compare with observed behaviours in a trial.
Campbell HE; Gray AM; Watson J; Jackson C; Moseley C; Cruickshank ME; Kitchener HC; Rivero-Arias O
Health Expect; 2020 Feb; 23(1):202-211. PubMed ID: 31659850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.
Lew JB; Simms KT; Smith MA; Hall M; Kang YJ; Xu XM; Caruana M; Velentzis LS; Bessell T; Saville M; Hammond I; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Text messages to increase attendance to follow-up cervical cancer screening appointments among HPV-positive Tanzanian women (Connected2Care): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Linde DS; Andersen MS; Mwaiselage JD; Manongi R; Kjaer SK; Rasch V
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):555. PubMed ID: 29162148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomised controlled trial and cohort study using electronic health records.
McDermott L; Wright AJ; Cornelius V; Burgess C; Forster AS; Ashworth M; Khoshaba B; Clery P; Fuller F; Miller J; Dodhia H; Rudisill C; Conner MT; Gulliford MC
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(84):1-92. PubMed ID: 27846927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The second Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT-2) trial: does the provision of telephone support enhance the effectiveness of computer-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy? A randomised controlled trial.
Brabyn S; Araya R; Barkham M; Bower P; Cooper C; Duarte A; Kessler D; Knowles S; Lovell K; Littlewood E; Mattock R; Palmer S; Pervin J; Richards D; Tallon D; White D; Walker S; Worthy G; Gilbody S
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(89):1-64. PubMed ID: 27922448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of use of vaginal HPV self-sampling and offering flexible appointments as strategies to reach long-term non-attending women in organized cervical screening.
Darlin L; Borgfeldt C; Forslund O; Hénic E; Hortlund M; Dillner J; Kannisto P
J Clin Virol; 2013 Sep; 58(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 23867008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.
Kim JJ; Burger EA; Sy S; Campos NG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 27754955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
