These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

934 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27633157)

  • 1. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
    van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Larghi A; Iglesias-Garcia J; Poley JW; Monges G; Petrone MC; Rindi G; Abdulkader I; Arcidiacono PG; Costamagna G; Biermann K; Bories E; Doglioni C; Dominguez-Muñoz JE; Hassan C; Bruno M; Giovannini M
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3733-8. PubMed ID: 23644834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
    Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
    Vanbiervliet G; Napoléon B; Saint Paul MC; Sakarovitch C; Wangermez M; Bichard P; Subtil C; Koch S; Grandval P; Gincul R; Karsenti D; Heyries L; Duchmann JC; Bourgaux JF; Levy M; Calament G; Fumex F; Pujol B; Lefort C; Poincloux L; Pagenault M; Bonin EA; Fabre M; Barthet M
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25098612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Abdelfatah MM; Grimm IS; Gangarosa LM; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Feb; 87(2):495-500. PubMed ID: 28882575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of the Standard 22-Gauge Needle and the New 20-Gauge Forward-Bevel Core Biopsy Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Pancreatic Lesions.
    Fujie S; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Sato J; Matsubayashi H; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H
    Gut Liver; 2019 May; 13(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 30600677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 29305893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The diagnostic and cellularity yield of reverse bevel versus fork-tip fine needle biopsy.
    Abdelfatah MM; Hamed A; Koutlas NJ; Aly FZ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Aug; 46(8):649-655. PubMed ID: 29737018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration in pancreatic cystic lesions.
    Barresi L; Tarantino I; Traina M; Granata A; Curcio G; Azzopardi N; Baccarini P; Liotta R; Fornelli A; Maimone A; Jovine E; Cennamo V; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Jan; 46(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23916241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Kamata K; Kitano M; Yasukawa S; Kudo M; Chiba Y; Ogura T; Higuchi K; Fukutake N; Ashida R; Yamasaki T; Nebiki H; Hirose S; Hoki N; Asada M; Yazumi S; Takaoka M; Okazaki K; Matsuda F; Okabe Y; Yanagisawa A
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 27129137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial comparing a side-port needle and standard needle for EUS-guided histology of pancreatic lesions.
    Ishiwatari H; Hayashi T; Kawakami H; Isayama H; Hisai H; Itoi T; Ono M; Kawakubo K; Yamamoto N; Tanaka M; Itokawa F; Oshiro H; Sonoda T; Hasegawa T;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Oct; 84(4):670-8. PubMed ID: 26995688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.