These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27633218)

  • 1. Advanced driver assistance systems: Using multimodal redundant warnings to enhance road safety.
    Biondi F; Strayer DL; Rossi R; Gastaldi M; Mulatti C
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():238-244. PubMed ID: 27633218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone.
    Mohebbi R; Gray R; Tan HZ
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 19634313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors.
    Navarro J; Deniel J; Yousfi E; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):123-131. PubMed ID: 27890120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
    Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system.
    Kidd DG; Buonarosa ML
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():177-185. PubMed ID: 28454863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of mapping characteristic on audiovisual warning: Evidence from a simulated driving study.
    Wang Y; Wu B; Ma S; Wang D; Gan T; Liu H; Yang Z
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Feb; 99():103638. PubMed ID: 34768226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age, cognitive load, and multimodal effects on driver response to directional warning.
    Lundqvist LM; Eriksson L
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Apr; 76():147-154. PubMed ID: 30642519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.
    Ali Y; Haque MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107015. PubMed ID: 36889237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Looming auditory collision warnings for driving.
    Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21469534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic vibrotactile warning signals for frontal collision avoidance: towards the torso versus towards the head.
    Meng F; Ho C; Gray R; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 25374255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory displays as occasion setters.
    Mckeown D; Isherwood S; Conway G
    Hum Factors; 2010 Feb; 52(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 20653225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze position modulates the effectiveness of forward collision warnings for drowsy drivers.
    Gaspar JG; Schwarz CW; Brown TL; Kang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():25-30. PubMed ID: 29277383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.