These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27633238)

  • 1. Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.
    Ahlstrom C; Kircher K
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():414-423. PubMed ID: 27633238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of an in-vehicle eco-safe driving system on drivers' glance behaviour.
    Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():143-152. PubMed ID: 30384084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers.
    Kidd DG; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Feb; 87():92-101. PubMed ID: 26656150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential in-vehicle glance distributions: an alternative approach for analyzing glance data.
    Yamani Y; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Fisher DL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 25977319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.
    Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105756. PubMed ID: 32919220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Interaction Patterns with Hybrid Electric Vehicle Eco-Features for Drivers' Eco-Driving Performance.
    Arend MG; Franke T
    Hum Factors; 2017 Mar; 59(2):314-327. PubMed ID: 27702984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of human-machine interface modality, specificity, and timing on driver performance and behavior while using vehicle automation.
    Wang M; Parker J; Wong N; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC; Kim W; Romo A; Horrey WJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107606. PubMed ID: 38733810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The correlation between drivers' road familiarity and glance behavior using real vehicle experimental data and mathematical models.
    Huang J; Hu Y; Hu L; Guo G; Gao K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 38709142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving.
    Lee J; Mehler B; Reimer B; Ebe K; Coughlin JF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Sep; 73(7):1190-1197. PubMed ID: 27698013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model for naturalistic glance behavior around Tesla Autopilot disengagements.
    Morando A; Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106348. PubMed ID: 34492560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of touch-key size on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety during simulated driving.
    Kim H; Kwon S; Heo J; Lee H; Chung MK
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 23759791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of momentary visual disruption on hazard anticipation and awareness in driving.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 24697569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does order matter? Investigating the effect of sequence on glance duration during on-road driving.
    Lee J; Roberts SC; Reimer B; Mehler B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171730. PubMed ID: 28158301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driving without wings: The effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behaviour, performance and opinions of drivers.
    Large DR; Crundall E; Burnett G; Harvey C; Konstantopoulos P
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jul; 55():138-148. PubMed ID: 26995044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction.
    Liang Y; Horrey WJ; Hoffman JD
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 25850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.