311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27633451)
1. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions.
Terzi H; Biler A; Demirtas O; Guler OT; Peker N; Kale A
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():51-57. PubMed ID: 27633451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.
Kim SM; Park EK; Jeung IC; Kim CJ; Lee YS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 25488157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy with Korean-made OCTO Port: Turkish surgeons' initial experience.
Kale A; Terzi H; Yavuz A; Kale E
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016; 36(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 26408502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery.
Mavrova R; Radosa JC; Wagenpfeil G; Hamza A; Solomayer EF; Juhasz-Böss I
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 134(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 27233815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced Training of Gynecologic Surgeons and Incidence of Intraoperative Complications after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of More Than 2000 Cases at a Single Institution.
McDonnell RM; Hollingworth JL; Chivers P; Cohen PA; Salfinger SG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):810-815. PubMed ID: 29253636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.
Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Brisbane learning curve.
Garrett AJ; Nascimento MC; Nicklin JL; Perrin LC; Obermair A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 17261104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the learning curve of laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in children: CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon's experience.
Wen Z; Liang H; Liang J; Liang Q; Xia H
Surg Endosc; 2017 Feb; 31(2):778-787. PubMed ID: 27338584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Sendag F; Zeybek B; Akdemir A; Ozgurel B; Oztekin K
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 24376016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases.
Paek J; Kim SW; Lee SH; Lee M; Yim GW; Nam EJ; Kim YT
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 22067204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic surgical systems.
Yazawa H; Takiguchi K; Imaizumi K; Wada M; Ito F
Fukushima J Med Sci; 2018 Apr; 64(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 29540624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing the learning curve for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: buddy operating as a technique for accelerating skill acquisition.
Reade C; Hauspy J; Schmuck ML; Moens F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jul; 21(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 21412161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.
Allam IS; Makled AK; Gomaa IA; El Bishry GM; Bayoumy HA; Ali DF
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1341-5. PubMed ID: 25524534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perioperative outcomes after total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with fast-track open hysterectomy - a retrospective case-control study.
Pather S; Loadsman JA; Mansfield C; Rao A; Arora V; Philp S; Carter J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Oct; 51(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 21810085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
