These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2763390)
1. Implantable drug delivery systems in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging--a comparison between titanium and stainless steel. Krog M; Magnusson A; Nyman R; Ericsson A Ups J Med Sci; 1989; 94(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 2763390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls. Filli L; Luechinger R; Frauenfelder T; Beck S; Guggenberger R; Farshad-Amacker N; Andreisek G Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 25417003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium. Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Kim RH; Cotter TM; Dunn MM; Patel ST; Spencer MJ; Wilson AS; Tager DS Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):789-94. PubMed ID: 20619749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging and the implantable port. Camp-Sorrell Oncol Nurs Forum; 1990; 17(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 2315183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Titanium hip implants for improved magnetic resonance and computed tomography examinations. Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Zeiss J; Jackson WT Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Feb; (275):194-8. PubMed ID: 1735213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments. Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cranio-orbital reconstruction: safety and image quality of metallic implants on CT and MRI scanning. Sullivan PK; Smith JF; Rozzelle AA Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Oct; 94(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 7938281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws. Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern? Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Titanium-alloy enhances bone-pedicle screw fixation: mechanical and histomorphometrical results of titanium-alloy versus stainless steel. Christensen FB; Dalstra M; Sejling F; Overgaard S; Bünger C Eur Spine J; 2000 Apr; 9(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10823424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The problem of metal clip artefacts in computerized tomography]. Vock P; Aeberhard P; Schneekloth G Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Apr; 112(16):561-7. PubMed ID: 7079695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of stainless steel, cobalt-chromium, titanium alloy, and titanium on the respiratory burst activity of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Pascual A; Tsukayama DT; Wicklund BH; Bechtold JE; Merritt K; Peterson PK; Gustilo RB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jul; (280):281-8. PubMed ID: 1319292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study. Cassetta M; Pranno N; Stasolla A; Orsogna N; Fierro D; Cavallini C; Cantisani V Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170051. PubMed ID: 28452576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring metal artifact reduction using dual-energy CT with pre-metal and post-metal implant cadaver comparison: are implant specific protocols needed? Wellenberg RHH; Donders JCE; Kloen P; Beenen LFM; Kleipool RP; Maas M; Streekstra GJ Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jun; 47(6):839-845. PubMed ID: 28842739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants. Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants. General safety and superior imaging with titanium. Rupp R; Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Jackson WT Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 8475442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between 4.0-mm stainless steel and 4.75-mm titanium alloy single-rod spinal instrumentation for anterior thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery. Yoon SH; Ugrinow VL; Upasani VV; Pawelek JB; Newton PO Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2173-8. PubMed ID: 18794758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]