These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27633948)

  • 21. Haplotyping for disease association: a combinatorial approach.
    Lancia G; Ravi R; Rizzi R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 18451433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Toward an algebraic understanding of haplotype inference by pure parsimony.
    Brown DG; Harrower IM
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2006; ():211-22. PubMed ID: 17369639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An approximation algorithm for haplotype inference by maximum parsimony.
    Huang YT; Chao KM; Chen T
    J Comput Biol; 2005 Dec; 12(10):1261-74. PubMed ID: 16379533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Haplotyping as perfect phylogeny: a direct approach.
    Bafna V; Gusfield D; Lancia G; Yooseph S
    J Comput Biol; 2003; 10(3-4):323-40. PubMed ID: 12935331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A mixed integer linear programming model to reconstruct phylogenies from single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes under the maximum parsimony criterion.
    Catanzaro D; Ravi R; Schwartz R
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2013 Jan; 8(1):3. PubMed ID: 23343437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An efficient algorithm for haplotype inference on pedigrees with recombinations and mutations.
    Pirola Y; Bonizzoni P; Jiang T
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 21383417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Power of direct vs. indirect haplotyping in association studies.
    Thomas S; Porteous D; Visscher PM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 14748011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Haplotype inferring via galled-tree networks is NP-complete.
    Gupta A; Karimi MM; Manuch J; Stacho L; Zhao X
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1435-49. PubMed ID: 20937016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computational problems in perfect phylogeny haplotyping: typing without calling the allele.
    Barzuza T; Beckmann JS; Shamir R; Pe'er I
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 18245879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A note on efficient computation of haplotypes via perfect phylogeny.
    Bafna V; Gusfield D; Hannenhalli S; Yooseph S
    J Comput Biol; 2004; 11(5):858-66. PubMed ID: 15700406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved haplotype assembly using Xor genotypes.
    Mousavi SR
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Apr; 298():122-30. PubMed ID: 22251889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The reliability of haplotyping inference in nuclear families: misassignment rates for SNPs and microsatellites.
    Lindholm E; Zhang J; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 57(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 15297805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Haplotype reconstruction from SNP fragments by minimum error correction.
    Wang RS; Wu LY; Li ZP; Zhang XS
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2456-62. PubMed ID: 15731204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Algorithm for haplotype inference via galled-tree networks with simple galls.
    Gupta A; Maňuch J; Stacho L; Zhao X
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):439-54. PubMed ID: 22468709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Haplotyping a single triploid individual based on genetic algorithm.
    Wu J; Chen X; Li X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3753-62. PubMed ID: 25227091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conditional probability methods for haplotyping in pedigrees.
    Gao G; Hoeschele I; Sorensen P; Du F
    Genetics; 2004 Aug; 167(4):2055-65. PubMed ID: 15342540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of several methods for haplotype frequency estimation and haplotype reconstruction for tightly linked markers from general pedigrees.
    Zhang K; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 16685719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Family trio phasing and missing data recovery.
    Brinza D; He J; Mao W; Zelikovsky A
    Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2005; 1(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 18048132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The haplotype assembly model with genotype information and iterative local-exhaustive search algorithm.
    Wang Y; Feng E; Wang R; Zhang D
    Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Aug; 31(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 17631422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maximum likelihood model based on minor allele frequencies and weighted Max-SAT formulation for haplotype assembly.
    Mousavi SR; Khodadadi I; Falsafain H; Nadimi R; Ghadiri N
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jun; 350():49-56. PubMed ID: 24491253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.