These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27634722)

  • 1. Don't Ask a Neuroscientist about Phases of the Moon.
    Shats K; Brindley T; Giordano J
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2016 Oct; 25(4):712-25. PubMed ID: 27634722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuroimaging in criminal trials and the role of psychiatrists expert witnesses: A case study.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J; Moulin V
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101359. PubMed ID: 29909218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuroethics and neurolaw in forensic neuropsychiatry: A guide for clinicians.
    Aggarwal NK; Jain A
    Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 37983666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?
    Shenton ME; Price BH; Levin L; Edersheim JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():50-63. PubMed ID: 30391039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.
    Gatowski SI; Dobbin SA; Richardson JT; Ginsburg GP; Merlino ML; Dahir V
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):433-58. PubMed ID: 11688367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: the state of the law and the science.
    Penrod SD; Fulero SM; Cutler BL
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):229-59. PubMed ID: 10150378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuropsychiatry at the Courtroom Gates: Selective Entry or Anything Goes?
    Brakel SJ; Gonzalez ER; Cavanaugh JL
    Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry; 1996 Jul; 1(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 10320423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Through a scanner darkly: functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states.
    Brown T; Murphy E
    Stanford Law Rev; 2010 Apr; 62(4):1119-208. PubMed ID: 20429137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.
    Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 11725885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
    Grivas CR; Komar DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.