These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Synthetic Auxotrophs with Ligand-Dependent Essential Genes for a BL21(DE3) Biosafety Strain. Lopez G; Anderson JC ACS Synth Biol; 2015 Dec; 4(12):1279-86. PubMed ID: 26072987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auxotrophy to Xeno-DNA: an exploration of combinatorial mechanisms for a high-fidelity biosafety system for synthetic biology applications. Whitford CM; Dymek S; Kerkhoff D; März C; Schmidt O; Edich M; Droste J; Pucker B; Rückert C; Kalinowski J J Biol Eng; 2018; 12():13. PubMed ID: 30123321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deployment of Engineered Microbes: Contributions to the Bioeconomy and Considerations for Biosecurity. Parker MT; Kunjapur AM Health Secur; 2020; 18(4):278-296. PubMed ID: 32816583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transgene Biocontainment Strategies for Molecular Farming. Clark M; Maselko M Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():210. PubMed ID: 32194598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A strategy for addicting transgene-free bacteria to synthetic modified metabolites. Kato Y Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1086094. PubMed ID: 36846762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advances in Synthetic Biology and Biosafety Governance. Li J; Zhao H; Zheng L; An W Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():598087. PubMed ID: 33996776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety by design: Biosafety and biosecurity in the age of synthetic genomics. Hoffmann SA; Diggans J; Densmore D; Dai J; Knight T; Leproust E; Boeke JD; Wheeler N; Cai Y iScience; 2023 Mar; 26(3):106165. PubMed ID: 36895643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast-Growing Engineered Microbes: New Concerns for Gain-of-Function Research? Pei L; Schmidt M Front Genet; 2018; 9():207. PubMed ID: 30008734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preparing synthetic biology for the world. Moe-Behrens GH; Davis R; Haynes KA Front Microbiol; 2013; 4():5. PubMed ID: 23355834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Engineered ion channels as emerging tools for chemical biology. Mayer M; Yang J Acc Chem Res; 2013 Dec; 46(12):2998-3008. PubMed ID: 23932142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coupling microbial catabolic actions with abiotic redox processes: a new recipe for persistent organic pollutant (POP) removal. Jeon JR; Murugesan K; Nam IH; Chang YS Biotechnol Adv; 2013; 31(2):246-56. PubMed ID: 23153459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial Biocontainment Systems for Clinical, Agricultural, and Industrial Applications. Pantoja Angles A; Valle-Pérez AU; Hauser C; Mahfouz MM Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():830200. PubMed ID: 35186907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental issues in the planned release of genetically-engineered organisms. Sarma V Aust J Biotechnol; 1989 Jan; 3(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 2485312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]