These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2763609)
21. X-RAY PELVIMETRY. BARRON LR; HILL RO; LINKLETTER AM Can Med Assoc J; 1964 Dec; 91(23):1209-12. PubMed ID: 14226095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose. Seibert JA Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia. Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry. Anderson N; Humphries N; Wells JE Australas Radiol; 2005 Apr; 49(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 15845044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiologic technic and x-ray scanner]. Germond M; Raimondi S; Schnyder P; de Grandi P J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1989; 18(8):1002-6. PubMed ID: 2621327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy? Huerta-Enochian GS; Katz VL; Fox LK; Hamlin JA; Kollath JP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 16731086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Sonographic diagnosis of channel pelvis]. Bartl W; Bernaschek G; Wolf G Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1984 Apr; 96(8):276-9. PubMed ID: 6741149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Measurement of the obstetrical pelvis by tomodensitometry (110 cases)]. Daghfous MH; Chechia A; Sfar E; Khaled A; Jouini S; Chelli H; Ben Jaafar M Tunis Med; 1993 Nov; 71(11):517-21. PubMed ID: 8310543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Obstetric pelvimetry using digital radiography (CT topogram)]. Reisner K; Fettig O; Bartscher KH; Knappschneider U Rofo; 1985 May; 142(5):566-9. PubMed ID: 2988045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Vaginosonographic pelvimetry as a new method of the sonographic determination of internal pelvic measurements]. Deutinger J; Bernaschek G Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Jun; 46(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 3527857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the predictive value of X-ray pelvimetry and biparietal diameter in cephalopelvic disproportion. Mandry J; Grandjean H; Reme JM; Pastor J; Levade C; Pontonnier G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1983 Jul; 15(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 6617936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Status of radiologic pelvimetry]. Alder C; Aebi S; Bernhard M Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 47(7):483-6. PubMed ID: 3623050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Detection of cephalopelvic disproportion using a virtual reality model: a feasibility study of three cases]. Ami O; Chabrot P; Jardon K; Rocas D; Delmas V; Boyer L; Mage G J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 92(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21352725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of film-screen combinations with contrast detail diagram and interactive image analysis. 2: Linear assessment of grey scale ranges with interactive image analysis]. Stamm G; Eichbaum G; Hagemann G Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 9410005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]