These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27636221)

  • 1. Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Using Only Absorbable Suture for Mesh Fixation.
    Linder BJ; Anand M; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 27636221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Matthews CA; Geller EJ; Henley BR; Kenton K; Myers EM; Dieter AA; Parnell B; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG; Wu JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):355-364. PubMed ID: 32649494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Grimes CL; Luber KM; Lukacz ES; Brown HW; Ferrante KL; Dyer KY; Kirby AC; Menefee SA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 25421934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Chow GK; Elliott DS
    Int J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 26300382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical Outcomes Based on Suturing Technique During Vaginal Mesh Attachment in Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Bazzi AA; Osmundsen BC; Hagglund KH; Aslam MF
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):105-108. PubMed ID: 30807409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy using barbed delayed absorbable sutures.
    Borahay MA; Oge T; Walsh TM; Patel PR; Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 24263027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical features, perioperative and anatomical outcomes of a standardized suturing pattern for robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Misasi G; Falcone M; Caretto M; Morganti R; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3085-3092. PubMed ID: 35037972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 28118173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Securing Mesh with Delayed Absorbable Suture Does Not Increase Risk of Prolapse Recurrence After Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
    Powell CR; Tachibana I; Eckrich B; Rothenberg J; Hathaway J
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):944-949. PubMed ID: 32037875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A pilot study comparing anatomic failure after sacrocolpopexy with absorbable or permanent sutures for vaginal mesh attachment.
    Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA; Lippmann Q; Lukacz ES; Luber KM; Nager CW
    Perm J; 2014; 18(4):40-4. PubMed ID: 25662525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
    Jong K; Klein T; Zimmern PE
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 28980173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes.
    Ferrando CA; Paraiso MFR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 33471144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation.
    El-Nashar SA
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2024 Sep; 30(9):733-735. PubMed ID: 39172456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go?
    Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mid term outcome of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
    Belsante M; Murray S; Dillon B; Zimmern P
    Can J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):6656-61. PubMed ID: 23433141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.
    Heinonen PK; Nieminen K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21561703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Sung HH; Ko KJ; Suh YS; Ryu GH; Lee KS
    Int Neurourol J; 2017 Mar; 21(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 28361513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.