596 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27636399)
1. Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves.
Redondo Palacios A; López Menéndez J; Miguelena Hycka J; Martín García M; Varela Barca L; Ferreiro Marzal A; Muñoz Pérez R; Oliva de Anquín E; García Andrade I; Centella Hernández T; Celemín Canorea D; Rodríguez-Roda Stuart J
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):739-746. PubMed ID: 27636399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term results of isolated tricuspid valve replacement.
Tokunaga S; Masuda M; Shiose A; Tomita Y; Morita S; Tominaga R
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2008 Jan; 16(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 18245701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When should a mechanical tricuspid valve replacement be considered?
Said SM; Burkhart HM; Schaff HV; Johnson JN; Connolly HM; Dearani JA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Aug; 148(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 24199756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thrombolytic Therapy for Right-Sided Mechanical Pulmonic and Tricuspid Valves: The Largest Survival Analysis to Date.
Taherkhani M; Hashemi SR; Hekmat M; Safi M; Taherkhani A; Movahed MR
Tex Heart Inst J; 2015 Dec; 42(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 26664307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Durability of bioprostheses for the tricuspid valve in patients with congenital heart disease.
Burri M; Vogt MO; Hörer J; Cleuziou J; Kasnar-Samprec J; Kühn A; Lange R; Schreiber C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 50(5):988-993. PubMed ID: 27005978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era.
Filsoufi F; Anyanwu AC; Salzberg SP; Frankel T; Cohn LH; Adams DH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 16122441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic follow up of patients with CarboMedics valves in the tricuspid position.
Shapira Y; Nili M; Hirsch R; Vaturi M; Vidne B; Sagie A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 10888097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement after previous left-side heart surgery.
Buzzatti N; Iaci G; Taramasso M; Nisi T; Lapenna E; De Bonis M; Maisano F; Alfieri O
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 46(4):713-9; discussion 719. PubMed ID: 24477739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results and factors associated with adverse outcome after tricuspid valve replacement.
Litwiński P; Kołsut P; Sitko T; Zieliński T; Hoffman P; Hryniewiecki T; Różański J; Kuśmierczyk M
Kardiol Pol; 2018; 76(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 29589379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Twenty-five year outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement comparing mechanical and biologic prostheses.
Garatti A; Nano G; Bruschi G; Canziani A; Colombo T; Frigiola A; Martinelli L; Menicanti L
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 93(4):1146-53. PubMed ID: 22342993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery in patients at high risk.
Ricci D; Boffini M; Barbero C; El Qarra S; Marchetto G; Rinaldi M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Mar; 147(3):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23623618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tricuspid valve replacement: the effect of gender on operative results.
Leviner DB; Medalion B; Baruch I; Sagie A; Sharoni E; Fuks A; Aravot D; Sharony R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 25076552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tricuspid valve replacement. Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses.
Scully HE; Armstrong CS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 109(6):1035-41. PubMed ID: 7776666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Further experience with the "no-react" bioprosthesis in patients with active infective endocarditis: 11-year single center results in 402 patients.
Musci M; Amiri A; Siniawski H; Stein J; Weng Y; Hetzer R
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 61(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 23564537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after surgery for severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation.
Kim JB; Jung SH; Choo SJ; Chung CH; Lee JW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 146(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 22871566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tricuspid valve replacement: results of an orphan procedure - which is the best prosthesis?
Wiedemann D; Rupprechter V; Mascherbauer J; Kammerlander A; Mora B; Dimitrov K; Weber B; Andreas M; Laufer G; Kocher A
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2018 Aug; 59(4):626-632. PubMed ID: 29430890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvenous, antegrade Melody valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic mitral and tricuspid valve dysfunction: a case series in children and adults.
Cullen MW; Cabalka AK; Alli OO; Pislaru SV; Sorajja P; Nkomo VT; Malouf JF; Cetta F; Hagler DJ; Rihal CS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 23683739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tricuspid valve replacement: postoperative and long-term results.
Van Nooten GJ; Caes F; Taeymans Y; Van Belleghem Y; François K; De Bacquer D; Deuvaert FE; Wellens F; Primo G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Sep; 110(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 7564433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
