432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27636766)
1. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative analysis of 3D data visibility of the prepared tooth finishing line on a synthetic jaw model, captured by international scanners in a laboratory conditions].
Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(5):39-46. PubMed ID: 27876722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors.
Abduo J; Elseyoufi M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):101-121. PubMed ID: 29989757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study.
Vandeweghe S; Vervack V; Dierens M; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):648-653. PubMed ID: 27150731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A
J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
Amin S; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 28039903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) on The Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM Single Crowns.
Ferrini F; Sannino G; Chiola C; Capparé P; Gastaldi G; Gherlone EF
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 30769768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners.
Di Fiore A; Meneghello R; Graiff L; Savio G; Vigolo P; Monaco C; Stellini E
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 31072730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Attin T; Mehl A
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1495-504. PubMed ID: 26547869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.
Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.
Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An
Shaikh M; Lakha T; Kheur S; Qamri B; Kheur M
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 36511075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of intraoral scanners accuracy using 3D software: an in vivo study.
Pellitteri F; Albertini P; Vogrig A; Spedicato GA; Siciliani G; Lombardo L
Prog Orthod; 2022 Jul; 23(1):21. PubMed ID: 35781850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
