These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27636985)

  • 41. Liver specificity of the carcinogenicity of NOCs: a chemical-molecular perspective.
    Yuan J; Pu Y; Yin L
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2432-42. PubMed ID: 23043541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. First report on a classification-based QSAR model for chemical toxicity to earthworm.
    Roy J; Kumar Ojha P; Carnesecchi E; Lombardo A; Roy K; Benfenati E
    J Hazard Mater; 2020 Mar; 386():121660. PubMed ID: 31784141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
    Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of criteria used to access carcinogenicity in CPANN QSAR models versus the knowledge-based expert system Toxtree.
    Fjodorova N; Novič M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(6):423-41. PubMed ID: 24716754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. QSAR trout toxicity models on aromatic pesticides.
    Slavov S; Gini G; Benfenati E
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2008 Nov; 43(8):633-7. PubMed ID: 18941985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. QSARs of aromatic amines: identification of potent carcinogens.
    Franke R; Gruska A; Bossa C; Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 2010 Sep; 691(1-2):27-40. PubMed ID: 20600167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Structural findings of phenylindoles as cytotoxic antimitotic agents in human breast cancer cell lines through multiple validated QSAR studies.
    Adhikari N; Halder AK; Saha A; Das Saha K; Jha T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Oct; 29(7):1392-404. PubMed ID: 26026499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Predictive QSAR modeling of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor TIBO derivatives.
    Mandal AS; Roy K
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Apr; 44(4):1509-24. PubMed ID: 18760864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Critical review on the carcinogenic potential of pesticides used in Korea.
    Choi S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(15):5999-6003. PubMed ID: 25124563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Exploring molecular fingerprints of selective PPARδ agonists through comparative and validated chemometric techniques.
    Nandy A; Roy K; Saha A
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(5):363-82. PubMed ID: 25986170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quantitative structure-toxicity relationship study of lethal concentration to tadpole (Bufo vulgaris formosus) for organophosphorous pesticides.
    Yan D; Jiang X; Xu S; Wang L; Bian Y; Yu G
    Chemosphere; 2008 May; 71(10):1809-15. PubMed ID: 18395243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. QSPR modeling of soil sorption coefficients (K(OC)) of pesticides using SPA-ANN and SPA-MLR.
    Goudarzi N; Goodarzi M; Araujo MC; Galvão RK
    J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Aug; 57(15):7153-8. PubMed ID: 19722589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A general QSAR model for predicting the acute toxicity of pesticides to Lepomis macrochirus.
    Devillers J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2001 Feb; 11(5-6):397-417. PubMed ID: 11328712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative QSAR modeling of CCR5 receptor binding affinity of substituted 1-(3,3-diphenylpropyl)-piperidinyl amides and ureas.
    Thomas Leonard J; Roy K
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2006 Sep; 16(17):4467-74. PubMed ID: 16806923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines.
    Kar S; Roy K
    Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quantitative structure-activity/ecotoxicity relationships (QSAR/QEcoSAR) of a series of phosphonates.
    Petrescu AM; Putz MV; Ilia G
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 40(3):800-24. PubMed ID: 26462182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development of QSAR models for predicting hepatocarcinogenic toxicity of chemicals.
    Massarelli I; Imbriani M; Coi A; Saraceno M; Carli N; Bianucci AM
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 44(9):3658-64. PubMed ID: 19272677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Fisher discriminant analysis for carcinogenic potency of aromatic amines].
    Zhu Y; Yu Y; Chen X
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 33(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11864450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. QSAR models for Daphnia toxicity of pesticides based on combinations of topological parameters of molecular structures.
    Toropov AA; Benfenati E
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 14(8):2779-88. PubMed ID: 16377200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quantitative structure carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso-compounds: species: rat; sex: male; route of administration: water.
    Helguera AM; Cordeiro MN; Pérez MA; Combes RD; González MP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Sep; 231(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 18533217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.