These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27637211)

  • 1. The role of surgical simulation and the learning curve in robot-assisted surgery.
    Bareeq RA; Jayaraman S; Kiaii B; Schlachta C; Denstedt JD; Pautler SE
    J Robot Surg; 2008 May; 2(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 27637211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device.
    Foell K; Furse A; Honey RJ; Pace KT; Lee JY
    J Robot Surg; 2013 Dec; 7(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 27001876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Objective surgery -- advanced robotic devices and simulators used for surgical skill assessment].
    Suhánszki N; Haidegger T
    Magy Seb; 2014 Dec; 67(6):340-52. PubMed ID: 25500641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning curves in expert and non-expert laparoscopic surgeons for robotic suturing with the da Vinci(®) Surgical System.
    Sumi Y; Dhumane PW; Komeda K; Dallemagne B; Kuroda D; Marescaux J
    J Robot Surg; 2013 Mar; 7(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 27000889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces.
    Klein MI; Warm JS; Riley MA; Matthews G; Doarn C; Donovan JF; Gaitonde K
    J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1089-94. PubMed ID: 22429084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open surgical simulation--a review.
    Davies J; Khatib M; Bello F
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(5):618-27. PubMed ID: 24016373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotics and telesurgery--an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Rassweiler J; Safi KC; Subotic S; Teber D; Frede T
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2005; 14(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 16754625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology - Pros and cons.
    Singh AG
    Indian J Urol; 2018; 34(4):245-253. PubMed ID: 30337778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a dedicated robot-assisted surgery training program.
    Attalla K; Raza SJ; Rehman S; Din R; Stegemann A; Field E; Curti L; Sexton S; Bienko M; Bhandari M; Guru KA
    Can J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(6):7084-90. PubMed ID: 24331355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.
    Thinggaard E
    Dan Med J; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28385174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
    Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons.
    Guru KA; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Bienko M; Glasgow M; Underwood W; Wilding G; Mohler JL; Menon M; Peabody JO
    Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4736-41; discussion 4741. PubMed ID: 19671225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.
    Park JH; Kim SY; Lee CR; Park S; Jeong JS; Kang SW; Jeong JJ; Nam KH; Chung WY; Park CS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2741-5. PubMed ID: 23494081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy?
    Patel MN; Aboumohamed A; Hemal A
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):990-4. PubMed ID: 26123244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic surgery: review of the latest advances, risks, and outcomes.
    Gastrich MD; Barone J; Bachmann G; Anderson M; Balica A
    J Robot Surg; 2011 Jun; 5(2):79-97. PubMed ID: 27637534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training in robotics: The learning curve and contemporary concepts in training.
    Bach C; Miernik A; Schönthaler M
    Arab J Urol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 26019925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic Surgery Simulator: Elements to Build a Training Program.
    Tillou X; Collon S; Martin-Francois S; Doerfler A
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):870-8. PubMed ID: 27211879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping the maze of minimally invasive surgery simulators.
    van Empel PJ; van der Veer WM; van Rijssen LB; Cuesta MA; Scheele F; Bonjer HJ; Meijerink WJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012; 22(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 22145607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.