These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27637296)

  • 1. Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.
    Cook DA; Wittich CM; Daniels WL; West CP; Harris AM; Beebe TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e244. PubMed ID: 27637296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.
    Murphy CC; Craddock Lee SJ; Geiger AM; Cox JV; Ahn C; Nair R; Gerber DE; Halm EA; McCallister K; Skinner CS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):123. PubMed ID: 32429848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of a financial incentive on health researchers' response to an online survey: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wilson PM; Petticrew M; Calnan M; Nazareth I
    J Med Internet Res; 2010 May; 12(2):e13. PubMed ID: 20457556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which Outreach Modes Improve Response Rates to Physician Surveys? Lessons from an Experiment at the American Board of Internal Medicine.
    Barnhart BJ; Reddy SG; Vandergrift JL
    Eval Health Prof; 2023 Mar; 46(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 36445930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.
    Starr K; McPherson G; Forrest M; Cotton SC
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():295. PubMed ID: 26152519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.
    Brtnikova M; Crane LA; Allison MA; Hurley LP; Beaty BL; Kempe A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202755. PubMed ID: 30138406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
    Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.
    Glidewell L; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Bonetti D; Johnston M; Eccles MP; Edlin R; Pitts NB; Clarkson J; Steen N; Grimshaw JM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Aug; 12():250. PubMed ID: 22891875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review.
    Pit SW; Vo T; Pyakurel S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():76. PubMed ID: 24906492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.
    Grava-Gubins I; Scott S
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18854472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
    Dokkum NF; Koekenbier RH; van den Broek IV; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema JS; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; Op de Coul EL
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Mar; 12():176. PubMed ID: 22404911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a postcard versus a questionnaire as a first reminder in a postal lifestyle survey.
    Roberts H; Pearson JC; Dengler R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1993 Aug; 47(4):334-5. PubMed ID: 8228774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Recruitment Methods on Response Rate in a Web-Based Study for Primary Care Physicians: Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.
    So R; Shinohara K; Aoki T; Tsujimoto Y; Suganuma AM; Furukawa TA
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Feb; 20(2):e28. PubMed ID: 29422450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective.
    Hohwü L; Lyshol H; Gissler M; Jonsson SH; Petzold M; Obel C
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e173. PubMed ID: 23978658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Incentives on Physician Participation in Research Surveys: Randomized Experiment.
    Hawa S; Bane S; Kinsler K; Rector A; Chaichian Y; Falasinnu T; Simard JF
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 May; 8():e54343. PubMed ID: 38743466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using email reminders to engage physicians in an Internet-based CME intervention.
    Abdolrasulnia M; Collins BC; Casebeer L; Wall T; Spettell C; Ray MN; Weissman NW; Allison JJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 4():17. PubMed ID: 15453911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Turnbull AE; O'Connor CL; Lau B; Halpern SD; Needham DM
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):e189. PubMed ID: 26223821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risks and rewards of using prepaid vs. postpaid incentive checks on a survey of physicians.
    Wiant K; Geisen E; Creel D; Willis G; Freedman A; de Moor J; Klabunde C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 30305049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.