118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27637933)
1. Investigation of Microbubble Cavitation-Induced Calcein Release from Cells In Vitro.
Maciulevičius M; Tamošiūnas M; Jakštys B; Jurkonis R; Venslauskas MS; Šatkauskas S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 27637933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of Metrics for Molecular Sonotransfer in Vitro.
Maciulevicius M; Tamosiunas M; Jurkonis R; Venslauskas MS; Satkauskas S
Mol Pharm; 2015 Oct; 12(10):3620-7. PubMed ID: 26312556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability.
Lai CY; Wu CH; Chen CC; Li PC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1931-41. PubMed ID: 17169705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbubble sonodestruction rate as a metric to evaluate sonoporation efficiency.
Tamosiūnas M; Jurkonis R; Mir LM; Lukosevicius A; Venslauskas MS; Satkauskas S
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 23197553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relation of Bleomycin Delivery Efficiency to Microbubble Sonodestruction and Cavitation Spectral Characteristics.
Maciulevičius M; Tamošiūnas M; Venslauskas MS; Šatkauskas S
Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7743. PubMed ID: 32385397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjustment of ultrasound exposure duration to microbubble sonodestruction kinetics for optimal cell sonoporation in vitro.
Tamosiūnas M; Jurkonis R; Mir LM; Lukosevicius A; Venslauskas MS; Satkauskas S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 11(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 22376133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells.
Forbes MM; Steinberg RL; O'Brien WD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2009-18. PubMed ID: 18692296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bleomycin delivery into cancer cells in vitro with ultrasound and SonoVue® or BR14® microbubbles.
Lamanauskas N; Novell A; Escoffre JM; Venslauskas M; Satkauskas S; Bouakaz A
J Drug Target; 2013 May; 21(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 23336182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bursting bubbles and bilayers.
Wrenn SP; Dicker SM; Small EF; Dan NR; Mleczko M; Schmitz G; Lewin PA
Theranostics; 2012; 2(12):1140-59. PubMed ID: 23382772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound well below the intensity threshold of cavitation can promote efficient uptake of small drug model molecules in fibroblast cells.
Domenici F; Giliberti C; Bedini A; Palomba R; Luongo F; Sennato S; Olmati C; Pozzi D; Morrone S; Congiu Castellano A; Bordi F
Drug Deliv; 2013; 20(7):285-95. PubMed ID: 24044646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-intensity ultrasound and microbubbles enhance the antitumor effect of cisplatin.
Watanabe Y; Aoi A; Horie S; Tomita N; Mori S; Morikawa H; Matsumura Y; Vassaux G; Kodama T
Cancer Sci; 2008 Dec; 99(12):2525-31. PubMed ID: 19018767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound triggered drug delivery with liposomal nested microbubbles.
Wallace N; Wrenn SP
Ultrasonics; 2015 Dec; 63():31-8. PubMed ID: 26152887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Acoustic Reflection on the Inertial Cavitation Dose in a Franz Diffusion Cell.
Robertson J; Becker S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 May; 44(5):1100-1109. PubMed ID: 29525456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonoporation of adherent cells under regulated ultrasound cavitation conditions.
Muleki Seya P; Fouqueray M; Ngo J; Poizat A; Inserra C; Béra JC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1008-19. PubMed ID: 25701522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calcein Release from Cells In Vitro via Reversible and Irreversible Electroporation.
Rajeckaitė V; Jakštys B; Rafanavičius A; Maciulevičius M; Jakutavičiūtė M; Šatkauskas S
J Membr Biol; 2018 Feb; 251(1):119-130. PubMed ID: 29143077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Different effects of sonoporation on cell morphology and viability.
Zhang JZ; Saggar JK; Zhou ZL; Hu B
Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2012 May; 12(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 22642588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal effect of inertial cavitation with and without microbubbles on surface deformation of agarose S gel in the presence of 1-MHz focused ultrasound.
Tomita Y; Matsuura T; Kodama T
Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():1-5. PubMed ID: 25130135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonoluminescence as an indicator of cell membrane disruption by acoustic cavitation.
Cochran SA; Prausnitz MR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jun; 27(6):841-50. PubMed ID: 11516544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound and microbubbles: their functions in gene transfer in vitro.
Chen Y; Huang D; Li K; Wang Z; Hong K; Wang F; Zang Q
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 27(4):479-82. PubMed ID: 17828517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
