136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27638566)
1. Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Robot Surg; 2010 May; 4(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 27638566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.
Jacome EG; Hebert AE; Christian F
J Robot Surg; 2013 Mar; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 27000891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative outcomes of three-port robotically assisted hysterectomy: a continuous series of 53 cases.
Dällenbach P; Petignat P
J Robot Surg; 2014 Sep; 8(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 27637681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Sendag F; Zeybek B; Akdemir A; Ozgurel B; Oztekin K
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 24376016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy.
Favre A; Huberlant S; Carbonnel M; Goetgheluck J; Revaux A; Ayoubi JM
Front Surg; 2016; 3():58. PubMed ID: 27853733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peri-operative outcomes of patients with stage IV endometriosis undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Brudie LA; Gaia G; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; Ghurani GB; Kendrick JE; Rakowski JA; Groton JH; Holloway RW
J Robot Surg; 2012 Dec; 6(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 27628471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Mendivil A; Rossi E; Hanna R
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):585-593. PubMed ID: 19701039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.
Feuer G; Benigno B; Krige L; Alvarez P
J Robot Surg; 2009 Oct; 3(3):179. PubMed ID: 27638376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.
Kilic GS; Moore G; Elbatanony A; Radecki C; Phelps JY; Borahay MA
Obstet Gynecol Int; 2011; 2011():683703. PubMed ID: 22007229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
