128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27638708)
1. Mechanics of the urethral duct: tissue constitutive formulation and structural modeling for the investigation of lumen occlusion.
Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG; Frigo A; Todros S; Rubini A; De Benedictis GM; Cerruto MA; Artibani W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Apr; 16(2):439-447. PubMed ID: 27638708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis of the interaction phenomena between artificial urinary sphincter and urethral duct.
Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Carniel EL
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Mar; 36(3):e3308. PubMed ID: 31945261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental investigation of the biomechanics of urethral tissues and structures.
Natali AN; Carniel EL; Frigo A; Pavan PG; Todros S; Pachera P; Fontanella CG; Rubini A; Cavicchioli L; Avital Y; De Benedictis GM
Exp Physiol; 2016 May; 101(5):641-56. PubMed ID: 26864993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction phenomena between a cuff of an artificial urinary sphincter and a urethral phantom.
Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG
Artif Organs; 2019 Sep; 43(9):888-896. PubMed ID: 30868625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urethral lumen occlusion by artificial sphincteric devices: a computational biomechanics approach.
Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG; Todros S; De Benedictis GM; Cerruto MA; Artibani W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Aug; 16(4):1439-1446. PubMed ID: 28343260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urethral lumen occlusion by artificial sphincteric device: Evaluation of degraded tissues effects.
Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Todros S; Carniel EL
J Biomech; 2017 Dec; 65():75-81. PubMed ID: 29042057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of interaction phenomena between lower urinary tract and artificial urinary sphincter in consideration of urethral tissues degeneration.
Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2099-2109. PubMed ID: 32363532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental evaluation of an electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter in an animal model.
Valerio M; Jichlinski P; Dahlem R; Tozzi P; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E337-43. PubMed ID: 23305222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conformation and mechanics of the polymeric cuff of artificial urinary sphincter.
Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Todros S; Pavan PG; Carmignato S; Zanini F; Carniel EL
Math Biosci Eng; 2020 May; 17(4):3894-3908. PubMed ID: 32987559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental investigation of the structural behavior of equine urethra.
Natali AN; Carniel EL; Frigo A; Fontanella CG; Rubini A; Avital Y; De Benedictis GM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Apr; 141():35-41. PubMed ID: 28241967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of occlusion methods for artificial sphincters.
Marziale L; Lucarini G; Mazzocchi T; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
Artif Organs; 2020 Sep; 44(9):995-1005. PubMed ID: 32216102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter: modelling and experimental validation.
Marti F; Leippold T; John H; Blunschi N; Müller B
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1361-75. PubMed ID: 16481700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Use of a Second Cuff Improve Artificial Urinary Sphincter Effectiveness? Evaluation Using a Comparative Cadaver Model.
Manka MG; Wright EJ
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1688-91. PubMed ID: 26165585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addition of a second urethral cuff to enhance performance of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Kabalin JN
J Urol; 1996 Oct; 156(4):1302-4. PubMed ID: 8808859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Mechanical Failures-Is it Better to Replace the Entire Device or Just the Malfunctioning Component?
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1523-1528. PubMed ID: 26493494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urethral support with PelviSoft after artificial urinary sphincter erosion at revision procedures.
Rehder P; Pinggera GM; Mitterberger M; Pelzer AE; Gozzi C; Herwig R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2007; 157(7-8):170-2. PubMed ID: 17492414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
