These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2763986)
21. Information in the ICU: are we being honest with our patients? The results of a European questionnaire. Vincent JL Intensive Care Med; 1998 Dec; 24(12):1251-6. PubMed ID: 9885876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A confederate's perspective on deception. Oliansky A Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11651141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Attitudes toward the use of deception in psychologically induced pain. Lustig BA; Coverdale J; Bayer T; Chiang E IRB; 1993; 15(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11654097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A survey of the opinions on 'informed consent' of women currently involved in clinical trials within a breast unit. Maslin A Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 1994 Dec; 3(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 7704350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Research participation as a contract. Lawson C Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11660017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The ethics of deception in biomedical research. Sharpe G; Weisstub DN Health Law Can; 1996 May; 16(4):101-10. PubMed ID: 10173418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Informed consent in tests of patient reliability. Bok S JAMA; 1992 Feb; 267(8):1118-9. PubMed ID: 1735930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent in school health research: why, how, and making it easy. Ross JG; Sundberg EC; Flint KH J Sch Health; 1999 May; 69(5):171-6. PubMed ID: 10363220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Observational research on the electronic superhighway; Problems on the Internet: a lawyer's perspective; The networker's perspective; Bioethics perspective; User's perspective. Rosenoer J; Isaacs S; Macklin R; Silverman S Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 11654167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Is it important to disclose how treatments are selected in clinical research and clinical care? Nayak RK; Wendler D AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(3):170-177. PubMed ID: 28949900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The utilitarian argument for medical confidentiality: a pilot study of patients' views. Jones C J Med Ethics; 2003 Dec; 29(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 14662814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A three-sample test of a masked alcohol screening questionnaire. Fleming MF; Barry KL Alcohol Alcohol; 1991; 26(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 1854376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States. Ruhnke GW; Wilson SR; Akamatsu T; Kinoue T; Takashima Y; Goldstein MK; Koenig BA; Hornberger JC; Raffin TA Chest; 2000 Oct; 118(4):1172-82. PubMed ID: 11035693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The patient's right to information in Japan--legal rules and doctor's opinions. Hattori H; Salzberg SM; Kiang WP; Fujimiya T; Tejima Y; Furuno J Soc Sci Med; 1991; 32(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 2047893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Informed consent: a study of experiences and opinion of utilizers of health services from India. Sriram TG; Kumar KV; Jayaprakash MR; Sriram R; Shanmugham V Soc Sci Med; 1991; 32(12):1389-92. PubMed ID: 1871610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Danish patients' attitudes to scientific-ethical questions. An interview study focusing therapeutic trials. Saurbrey N; Jensen J; Elmegaard Rasmussen P; Gjørup T; Guldager H; Riis P Acta Med Scand; 1984; 215(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 6702499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]