137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27639930)
1. Will rejecting woman-protective justifications for antiabortion laws increase harassment and violence?
Cohen DS
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):441-444. PubMed ID: 27639930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coming full circle: a reflection on the Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
Toti S
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 27639929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do not mess with Texas: A landmark victory for abortion access and the road ahead.
Kumar B
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):445-446. PubMed ID: 27639931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Keeping watch: U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
Am Nurse; 2016; 48(1):4. PubMed ID: 27017685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Violence against women and the U.S. Supreme Court: recent challenges and opportunities for advocates and practitioners.
Rutkow L; Vernick JS; Webster DW; Lennig DJ
Violence Against Women; 2009 Oct; 15(10):1248-58. PubMed ID: 19762719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. US Supreme Court expected to weaken abortion rights.
Jaffe S
Lancet; 2021 Dec; 398(10317):2137-2138. PubMed ID: 34895521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How Will Recent Abortion Legislation Affect Women's Health?
Zolot J
Am J Nurs; 2019 Aug; 119(8):15. PubMed ID: 31356314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Darney PD; Rosenfield A
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):226-7. PubMed ID: 17666593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Richman S
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Voutsos LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Use of Public Health Evidence in Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt.
Grossman D
JAMA Intern Med; 2017 Feb; 177(2):155-156. PubMed ID: 27820613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ACA's contraceptive mandate: religious freedom, women's health, and corporate personhood.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2014 Aug; 312(8):785-6. PubMed ID: 25014562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Texas governor promises to sign abortion law that will close most clinics.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2013 Jul; 347():f4584. PubMed ID: 23861439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe versus reality--abortion and women's health.
Wright AA; Katz IT
N Engl J Med; 2006 Jul; 355(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16822990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco.
Heminger JD
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Battaglia F
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Money, sex, and religion--the Supreme Court's ACA sequel.
Annas GJ; Ruger TW; Ruger JP
N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(9):862-6. PubMed ID: 25029337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]