160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27639931)
1. Do not mess with Texas: A landmark victory for abortion access and the road ahead.
Kumar B
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):445-446. PubMed ID: 27639931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coming full circle: a reflection on the Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
Toti S
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 27639929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Keeping watch: U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
Am Nurse; 2016; 48(1):4. PubMed ID: 27017685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Will rejecting woman-protective justifications for antiabortion laws increase harassment and violence?
Cohen DS
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):441-444. PubMed ID: 27639930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflections on Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt: savoring victory, anticipating further challenges.
Joffe C
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):436-438. PubMed ID: 27639928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Texas governor promises to sign abortion law that will close most clinics.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2013 Jul; 347():f4584. PubMed ID: 23861439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. US Supreme Court expected to weaken abortion rights.
Jaffe S
Lancet; 2021 Dec; 398(10317):2137-2138. PubMed ID: 34895521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How Will Recent Abortion Legislation Affect Women's Health?
Zolot J
Am J Nurs; 2019 Aug; 119(8):15. PubMed ID: 31356314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Roe versus reality--abortion and women's health.
Wright AA; Katz IT
N Engl J Med; 2006 Jul; 355(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16822990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Darney PD; Rosenfield A
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):226-7. PubMed ID: 17666593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Use of Public Health Evidence in Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt.
Grossman D
JAMA Intern Med; 2017 Feb; 177(2):155-156. PubMed ID: 27820613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Providers feeling the heat? Vatican's rebuke of nuns may signal reform ahead.
Selvam A
Mod Healthc; 2012 May; 42(19):17. PubMed ID: 22666955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women.
Weitz TA; Fogel SB
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ireland's parliament votes to allow "life saving" abortion.
Houston M
BMJ; 2013 Jul; 347():f4573. PubMed ID: 23861438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court Strikes Down Abortion Regulations; Texas Bill Found Unconstitutional.
Kraus M
Am J Law Med; 2016 Nov; 42(4):859-861. PubMed ID: 29086652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban.
Preston J
N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preparing for a post-Roe world.
Minkoff H; Gibbs RS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):249.e1-249.e3. PubMed ID: 30471257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
