These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27639931)

  • 41. Mental health outcomes of abortion and its alternatives: implications for future policy.
    Kornfield SL; Geller PA
    Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 20211428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.
    Macklin R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Exporting misery. A U.S. abortion ruling affects women's health worldwide.
    Horgan J
    Sci Am; 1991 Aug; 265(2):16, 18. PubMed ID: 1862327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
    Arellano Mde J
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Buchbinder M; Mishtal J; Singer EO; Wendland CL
    Med Anthropol Q; 2022 Dec; 36(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36433774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco.
    Heminger JD
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Finding Strength in Numbers: The Critical Role of Data in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Rosen JD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 129(1):195-196. PubMed ID: 27926653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Contraception at risk.
    The Editors
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Jan; 370(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 24328442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Texas Supreme Court blocks permitted abortion for woman with non-viable pregnancy.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2920. PubMed ID: 38081657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Back to the Future in Alabama.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2024 Apr; 390(14):1253-1255. PubMed ID: 38446638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
    Berkowitz JF
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. US Supreme Court to review "partial birth abortion" law.
    Tanne J
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7540):506. PubMed ID: 16513699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. US Supreme Court protects access to abortion medication.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2679-2680. PubMed ID: 38909610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.