These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2763996)
1. Mammographic parenchymal patterns in women receiving noncontraceptive estrogen treatment. Bergkvist L; Tabàr L; Adami HO; Persson I; Bergström R Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Sep; 130(3):503-10. PubMed ID: 2763996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urinary estrogen metabolites and mammographic parenchymal patterns in postmenopausal women. Riza E; dos Santos Silva I; De Stavola B; Bradlow HL; Sepkovic DW; Linos D; Linos A Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Jun; 10(6):627-34. PubMed ID: 11401912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Epidemiologic determinants of the mammographic parenchymal pattern. A population-based study within a mammographic screening program. Bergkvist L; Tabàr L; Bergström R; Adami HO Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Dec; 126(6):1075-81. PubMed ID: 3687919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of exogenous estrogen replacement therapy of the breast: breast cancer risk and mammographic parenchymal patterns. Bland KI; Buchanan JB; Weisberg BF; Hagan TA; Gray LA Cancer; 1980 Jun; 45(12):3027-33. PubMed ID: 6248185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study. Sala E; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Luben R; Day N Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):629-36. PubMed ID: 10922338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. Saftlas AF; Wolfe JN; Hoover RN; Brinton LA; Schairer C; Salane M; Szklo M Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Mar; 129(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 2916545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection. Chiarelli AM; Kirsh VA; Klar NS; Shumak R; Jong R; Fishell E; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1856-62. PubMed ID: 17035392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. Byrne C; Schairer C; Wolfe J; Parekh N; Salane M; Brinton LA; Hoover R; Haile R J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Nov; 87(21):1622-9. PubMed ID: 7563205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns. Sala E; Solomon L; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Luben R; Day N Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 10663736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. Boyd NF; Jensen HM; Cooke G; Han HL J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Aug; 84(15):1170-9. PubMed ID: 1635085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a dense mammographic parenchymal pattern a contraindication to hormonal replacement therapy? Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M Acta Oncol; 2000; 39(8):969-72. PubMed ID: 11207004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience. Ciatto S; Zappa M Eur J Radiol; 1993 Sep; 17(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 8223680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of breast cancer and changes in mammographic parenchymal patterns over time. Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M Acta Oncol; 1998; 37(6):547-51. PubMed ID: 9860312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and diet: a case-control study. Sala E; Warren R; Duffy S; Welch A; Luben R; Day N Br J Cancer; 2000 Jul; 83(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 10883679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Gram IT; Funkhouser E; Tabár L Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 9097055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study. Sala E; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Luben R; Day N Br J Cancer; 1999 Dec; 81(7):1257-61. PubMed ID: 10584891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States). Kato I; Beinart C; Bleich A; Su S; Kim M; Toniolo PG Cancer Causes Control; 1995 Sep; 6(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 8547541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme. Sala E; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Day N; Luben R J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 9934652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Favorable change in mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk factors. Salminen T; Hakama M; Heikkilä M; Saarenmaa I Int J Cancer; 1998 Nov; 78(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 9797126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? Brisson J; Diorio C; Mâsse B Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Aug; 12(8):728-32. PubMed ID: 12917203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]