These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27640055)

  • 1. Pragmatic evaluation of odour emissions from a rendering plant in southern Brazil.
    Vieira MM; Schirmer WN; de Melo Lisboa H; Belli Filho P; Guillot JM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec; 23(23):24115-24124. PubMed ID: 27640055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gas characteristics before and after biofiltration treating odorous emissions from animal rendering processes.
    Luo J; Agnew MP
    Environ Technol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):1091-103. PubMed ID: 11816770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modelling of odour dispersion as a support tool for the improvements of high odours impact plants.
    Luciano A; Torretta V; Mancini G; Eleuteri A; Raboni M; Viotti P
    Environ Technol; 2017 Mar; 38(5):588-597. PubMed ID: 27384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic olfactometry and GC-TOFMS to monitor the efficiency of an industrial biofilter.
    Gutiérrez MC; Martín MA; Pagans E; Vera L; García-Olmo J; Chica AF
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 512-513():572-581. PubMed ID: 25647372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of pine bark and natural zeolite as biofilter media to remove animal rendering process odours.
    Luo J; Lindsey S
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 Sep; 97(13):1461-9. PubMed ID: 16125382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry as a tool for estimating odour concentrations of biofilter effluents at aerobic composting and rendering plants.
    Defoer N; De Bo I; Van Langenhove H; Dewulf J; Van Elst T
    J Chromatogr A; 2002 Sep; 970(1-2):259-73. PubMed ID: 12350099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pilot-scale study on biofilters for controlling animal rendering process odours.
    Luo J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):277-85. PubMed ID: 11762474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterisation of odour masking agents often used in the solid waste industry for odour abatement.
    Decottignies V; Filippi G; Bruchet A
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 17489429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directive on odour in ambient air: an established system of odour measurement and odour regulation in Germany.
    Both R
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):119-26. PubMed ID: 11762451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Olfactometric approach for the evaluation of citizens' exposure to industrial emissions in the city of Terni, Italy.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Céntola P; Rossi A; Austeri C
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 21106227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous measurement of atmospheric reduced sulphur compounds as key tracers between odour complaints and source apportionment.
    de Blas M; Navazo M; Alonso L; Gangoiti G; García JA; de Cámara ES; Valdenebro V; García-Ruiz E; García-Borreguero N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Mar; 189(3):102. PubMed ID: 28185157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Odorous gaseous emissions as influence by process condition for the forced aeration composting of pig slaughterhouse sludge.
    Blazy V; de Guardia A; Benoist JC; Daumoin M; Lemasle M; Wolbert D; Barrington S
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jul; 34(7):1125-38. PubMed ID: 24768513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dispersion modelling approach to determining the odour impact of intensive pig production units in Ireland.
    Sheridan BA; Hayes ET; Curran TP; Dodd VA
    Bioresour Technol; 2004 Jan; 91(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 14592743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.
    Brose G; Gallmann E; Hartung E; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):59-64. PubMed ID: 11762484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of odour emissions from animal housing systems with low ammonia emission.
    Ogink NW; Koerkamp PW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):245-52. PubMed ID: 11762469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental performance of an industrial biofilter: Relationship between photochemical oxidation and odorous impacts.
    Reyes J; Gutiérrez MC; Toledo M; Vera L; Sánchez L; Siles JA; Martín MA
    Environ Res; 2020 Apr; 183():109168. PubMed ID: 32004831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adverse effects of environmental odours: reviewing studies on annoyance responses and symptom reporting.
    Sucker K; Both R; Winneke G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):43-51. PubMed ID: 11762482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different approaches for the estimation of odour emissions from landfill surfaces.
    Lucernoni F; Capelli L; Sironi S
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():345-353. PubMed ID: 27769653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of odour impact criteria in selected countries around the world.
    Brancher M; Griffiths KD; Franco D; de Melo Lisboa H
    Chemosphere; 2017 Feb; 168():1531-1570. PubMed ID: 27939667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the inter-annual variability of separation distances around odour sources to protect the residents from odour annoyance.
    Brancher M; Piringer M; Franco D; Belli Filho P; De Melo Lisboa H; Schauberger G
    J Environ Sci (China); 2019 May; 79():11-24. PubMed ID: 30784436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.