176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27640412)
1. Agricultural land management options after the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents: The articulation of science, technology, and society.
Vandenhove H; Turcanu C
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Oct; 12(4):662-6. PubMed ID: 27640412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents.
Howard BJ; Fesenko S; Balonov M; Pröhl G; Nakayama S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(1-3):170-176. PubMed ID: 27886996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An extended critical review of twenty years of countermeasures used in agriculture after the Chernobyl accident.
Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Balonov MI; Bogdevitch IM; Howard BJ; Kashparov VA; Sanzharova NI; Panov AV; Voigt G; Zhuchenka YM
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Sep; 383(1-3):1-24. PubMed ID: 17573097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Societal and ethical aspects of the Fukushima accident.
Oughton D
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Oct; 12(4):651-3. PubMed ID: 27640410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: a review of the environmental impacts.
Steinhauser G; Brandl A; Johnson TE
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():800-17. PubMed ID: 24189103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concentration of radiocaesium in rice and irrigation water, and soil management practices in Oguni, Date, Fukushima.
Tsukada H; Ohse K
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Oct; 12(4):659-61. PubMed ID: 27640411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative analysis of the radionuclide composition in fallout after the Chernobyl and the Fukushima accidents].
Kotenko KV; Shinkarev SM; Abramov IuV; Granovskaia EO; Iatsenko VN; Gavrilin IuI; Margulis UIa; Garetskaia OS; Imanaka T; Khoshi M
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (10):1-5. PubMed ID: 23210176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavior of accidentally released radiocesium in soil-water environment: Looking at Fukushima from a Chernobyl perspective.
Konoplev A; Golosov V; Laptev G; Nanba K; Onda Y; Takase T; Wakiyama Y; Yoshimura K
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 3():568-78. PubMed ID: 26143175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of the countermeasures taken to mitigate exposure of the public to radioiodine following the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents: lessons from both accidents.
Uyba V; Samoylov A; Shinkarev S
J Radiat Res; 2018 Apr; 59(suppl_2):ii40-ii47. PubMed ID: 29415268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Chernobyl accident as a source of new radiological knowledge: implications for Fukushima rehabilitation and research programmes.
Balonov M
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 23295495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiological estimation of the protective measures used in agricultural complex of Belarus Republic in 2000-2005 (20 years after the accident on the Chernobyl NPP)].
Podoliak AG; Bogdevich IM; Ageets VIu; Timofeev SF
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2007; 47(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 17867506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: what has changed in the use of atmospheric dispersion modeling?
Benamrane Y; Wybo JL; Armand P
J Environ Radioact; 2013 Dec; 126():239-52. PubMed ID: 24077309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thirty years after the Chernobyl accident: What lessons have we learnt?
Beresford NA; Fesenko S; Konoplev A; Skuterud L; Smith JT; Voigt G
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jun; 157():77-89. PubMed ID: 27018344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Particle size distribution of radioactive aerosols after the Fukushima and the Chernobyl accidents.
Malá H; Rulík P; Bečková V; Mihalík J; Slezáková M
J Environ Radioact; 2013 Dec; 126():92-8. PubMed ID: 23974074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supporting societal and economic dynamics of recovery: lessons from Chernobyl and Fukushima.
Schneider T; Lochard J
Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):68-73. PubMed ID: 34115521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of thyroid cancer after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident.
Yamashita S; Suzuki S
Respir Investig; 2013 Sep; 51(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 23978638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Fukushima plume within regular Slovenian environmental radioactivity surveillance.
Glavič-Cindro D; Benedik L; Kožar Logar J; Vodenik B; Zorko B
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():374-8. PubMed ID: 23611815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The radioecological situation in the agricultural sphere in the contaminated regions of russia during the long-term after the Chernobyl accident].
Panov AV; Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM; Pasternak AD; Prudnikov PV; Sanzharova NI; Goriainov VA; Novikov AA; Muzalevskaia AA
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2007; 47(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 17953429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diversity of Concerns in Recovery after a Nuclear Accident: A Perspective from Fukushima.
Sato A; Lyamzina Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29462905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting the long-term (137)Cs distribution in Fukushima after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident: a parameter sensitivity analysis.
Yamaguchi M; Kitamura A; Oda Y; Onishi Y
J Environ Radioact; 2014 Sep; 135():135-46. PubMed ID: 24836353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
