These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Laparoscopic Major Vascular Injuries in Gynecologic Surgery for Benign Indications: A Systematic Review. King NR; Lin E; Yeh C; Wong JMK; Friedman J; Traylor J; Tsai S; Chaudhari A; Milad MP Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 137(3):434-442. PubMed ID: 33543898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V; J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Pulmonary Complications in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery. Burks C; Nelson L; Kumar D; Fogg L; Saha C; Guirguis A; Rotmensch J; Dewdney S J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):280-285. PubMed ID: 27836798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of laparoscopic ureteral injury in pelvic surgery. Ostrzenski A; Radolinski B; Ostrzenska KM Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2003 Dec; 58(12):794-9. PubMed ID: 14668660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use? Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Positioning Devices for Optimization of Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery. Das D; Propst K; Wechter ME; Kho RM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):244-252.e1. PubMed ID: 30176363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urinary Tract Injury at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and the Role of Cystoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Teeluckdharry B; Gilmour D; Flowerdew G Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1161-1169. PubMed ID: 26551173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women. Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative Complications and Conversion to Laparatomy in Gynecologic Robotic Surgery. Gokmen Karasu AF; Kıran G; Şanlıkan F J Invest Surg; 2022 Apr; 35(4):912-915. PubMed ID: 34286632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures. Unger CA; Lachiewicz MP; Ridgeway B Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27591050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bowel Injury in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: A Systematic Review. Grace L; Soliemannjad R Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1306. PubMed ID: 26595562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative peripheral nerve injury related to lithotomy positioning with steep Trendelenburg in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery - A systematic review. Bjøro B; Mykkeltveit I; Rustøen T; Candas Altinbas B; Røise O; Bentsen SB J Adv Nurs; 2020 Feb; 76(2):490-503. PubMed ID: 31736124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]