These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27640938)

  • 21. Urologic injuries during gynecologic surgery, a 10-year review.
    Satitniramai S; Manonai J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Mar; 43(3):557-563. PubMed ID: 28160521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medical malpractice claims in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a Dutch overview of 20 years.
    Sandberg EM; Bordewijk EM; Klemann D; Driessen SRC; Twijnstra ARH; Jansen FW
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5418-5426. PubMed ID: 28634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visceral and gastrointestinal complications in robotic urologic surgery.
    Velilla G; Redondo C; Sánchez-Salas R; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 28478913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
    Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-assisted Techniques Versus Open Techniques for Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.
    Wagenaar S; Nederhoed JH; Hoksbergen AWJ; Bonjer HJ; Wisselink W; van Ramshorst GH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):205-217. PubMed ID: 28262412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bowel injury in gynecologic operations: analysis of 110 cases.
    Bhattee GA; Rahman J; Rahman MS
    Int Surg; 2006; 91(6):336-40. PubMed ID: 17256432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gastric Injury at Laparoscopy for Gynecologic Indications: A Systematic Review.
    Hu H; Choi JDW; Edye MB; Aitken T; Kapurubandara S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 29(11):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 36184063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal resections with respect to 30-day perioperative morbidity.
    Feinberg AE; Elnahas A; Bashir S; Cleghorn MC; Quereshy FA
    Can J Surg; 2016 Aug; 59(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 27240135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Strategies to Prevent Urinary Tract Injury in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Propst K; Harnegie MP; Ridgeway B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):684-691.e2. PubMed ID: 32730987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
    Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Malfunction Events in the US FDA MAUDE Database: How Does Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Compare with Other Specialties?
    Correa J; Aribo C; Stuparich M; Nahas S; Cheung C; Behbehani S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):300-307.e1. PubMed ID: 34464761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incidence, risk factors and treatment of cervical stenosis after radical trachelectomy: A systematic review.
    Li X; Li J; Wu X
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Sep; 51(13):1751-9. PubMed ID: 26049687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is the robotic approach feasible for repair of iatrogenic injuries of the lower ureter?
    Franklin A; Pokala N; Jones C; Johans C; Strom K; Cummings J
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1323-8. PubMed ID: 26857009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Position-related injury is uncommon in robotic gynecologic surgery.
    Ulm MA; Fleming ND; Rallapali V; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT; Westin SN; Nick AM; Schmeler KM; Soliman PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 25449565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery distant from the surgical site.
    Maerz DA; Beck LN; Sim AJ; Gainsburg DM
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Apr; 118(4):492-503. PubMed ID: 28403397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Age and Body Mass Index on the Surgical Anatomy of Supraumbilical Port Insertion: Implications for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.
    Bedaiwy MA; Yong PJ; Farghaly TA; Abdelhafez FF; Tan J; Pope R; Hurd WW; Liu JH; Zanotti K
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(6):546-551. PubMed ID: 29705775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prevention and management of bowel injury during gynecologic laparoscopy: an update.
    Eisner IS; Wadhwa RK; Downing KT; Singhal PK
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 31(4):245-250. PubMed ID: 31045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laparoscopic bowel injury in retroperitoneal surgery: current incidence and outcomes.
    Schwartz MJ; Faiena I; Cinman N; Kucharczyk J; Meriggi JS; Waingankar N; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 20639022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complications of robotic foregut surgery: risks and advantages.
    Luo RB; Montalvo D; Suzuki T; Sandler BJ; Jacobsen GR; Horgan S
    Minerva Chir; 2017 Feb; 72(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 27787481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.