These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27641357)

  • 1. Short sheath benefit in radial artery injury after PCI - optical coherence tomography serial study.
    Novakova T; Kanovsky J; Miklik R; Bocek O; Poloczek M; Jerabek P; Privarova L; Ondrus T; Jarkovsky J; Benesova K; Spinar J; Kala P
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2016 Sep; 160(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 27641357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radial artery neointimal hyperplasia after transradial PCI-Serial optical coherence tomography volumetric study.
    Kala P; Kanovsky J; Novakova T; Miklik R; Bocek O; Poloczek M; Jerabek P; Prymkova L; Ondrus T; Jarkovsky J; Blaha M; Mintz GS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185404. PubMed ID: 29016632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radial artery complications occurring after transradial coronary procedures using long hydrophilic-coated introducer sheath: a frequency domain-optical coherence tomography study.
    Di Vito L; Burzotta F; Trani C; Pirozzolo G; Porto I; Niccoli G; Leone AM; Crea F
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 30(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24154615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrahigh-resolution ultrasound characterization of access site trauma and intimal hyperplasia following use of a 7F sheathless guide versus 6F sheath/guide combination for transradial artery PCI: Results of the PRAGMATIC trial.
    Batchelor W; Dahya V; McGee D; Katopodis J; Dixon W; Campbell J; Meredith A; Knap P; Parkin M; Noel T
    Am Heart J; 2018 Apr; 198():75-83. PubMed ID: 29653651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the conventional radial artery with optical coherent tomography after the snuffbox approach.
    Kim Y; Lee SY; Lee DI; Lee JH; Kim SM; Bae JW; Hwang KK; Kim DW; Cho MC; Jeong MH
    Cardiol J; 2021; 28(6):849-854. PubMed ID: 32710794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of sheath injury and trimetazidine on endothelial dysfunction of radial artery after transradial catheterization.
    Park KH; Park DW; Kim MK; Kim HS; Park WJ; Cho GY; Choi YJ
    J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 25(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 22536918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of early radial injury after transradial coronary intervention by high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy: innovative technology application.
    Shen H; Zhou YJ; Liu YY; DU J; Liu XL; Yan ZX; Wang ZJ; Gao F; Yang SW; Jia DA; Han HY; Yu M; Ma Q; Xu XH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Oct; 125(19):3388-92. PubMed ID: 23044293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Access site-related complications after transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath size and statins.
    Honda T; Fujimoto K; Miyao Y; Koga H; Hirata Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2012 Sep; 27(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 22669817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study.
    Wijns W; Shite J; Jones MR; Lee SW; Price MJ; Fabbiocchi F; Barbato E; Akasaka T; Bezerra H; Holmes D
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3346-55. PubMed ID: 26242713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after transradial coronary intervention by optical coherence tomography.
    Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Lee T; Takayama K; Kakita K; Iwamoto T; Kawaguchi N; Takahashi K; Yamamoto G; Iesaka Y; Fujiwara H; Isobe M
    Eur Heart J; 2010 Jul; 31(13):1608-15. PubMed ID: 20413398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between Right Versus Left Radial Arterial Access in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Elmahdy MF; ElMaghawry M; Hassan M; Kassem HH; Said K; Elfaramawy AA
    Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Jan; 26(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27374862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available.
    Kedev S; Zafirovska B; Dharma S; Petkoska D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E51-60. PubMed ID: 23832623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.
    Applegate R; Sacrinty M; Schafer P; Smith J; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Cecile A; Little W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E375-84. PubMed ID: 23074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized radial approach reduces access site complications: a prospective observational registry.
    Markovic S; Imhof A; Kunze M; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
    Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Jan; 26(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 25211653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI).
    Gellen B; Lesault PF; Canouï-Poitrine F; Champagne S; Mouillet G; Pongas D; Le Thuaut A; Jakljevic T; Boudiche S; de la Vega M; Maalej A; Veugeois A; Dubois-Randé JL; Teiger E
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1056-61. PubMed ID: 23159410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radial Artery Remodeling following Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Men and Women: Insights from Serial Ultrahigh Frequency Ultrasonography.
    Batchelor W; Dahya V; Tehrani B; Damluji A; Sherwood M; Barnett S; Epps K; Truesdell A; Geloo N; Katopodis J; Dixon W; Yazdani S; Noel T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Mar; 21(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 31171471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique.
    Mohsen A; Alqasrawi M; Shantha GPS; DeZorzi C; Panaich S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12026. PubMed ID: 30104697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of transradial coronary procedures on radial artery.
    Zhenxian Yan ; Yujie Zhou ; Yingxin Zhao ; Zhiming Zhou ; Shiwei Yang ; Zhijian Wang
    Angiology; 2010; 61(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19815606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.