These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27641652)

  • 21. Bringing forecasting into the future: Using Google to predict visitation in U.S. national parks.
    Clark M; Wilkins EJ; Dagan DT; Powell R; Sharp RL; Hillis V
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():88-94. PubMed ID: 31082755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using social media to estimate visitor provenance and patterns of recreation in Germany's national parks.
    Sinclair M; Mayer M; Woltering M; Ghermandi A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 263():110418. PubMed ID: 32883482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in park characteristic preferences for visitation and physical activity among adolescents: A latent class analysis.
    Mertens L; Van Cauwenberg J; Veitch J; Deforche B; Van Dyck D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212920. PubMed ID: 30883562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterizing, mapping and valuing the demand for forest recreation using crowdsourced social media data.
    Lingua F; Coops NC; Lafond V; Gaston C; Griess VC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272406. PubMed ID: 35951615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recreational use in dispersed public lands measured using social media data and on-site counts.
    Fisher DM; Wood SA; White EM; Blahna DJ; Lange S; Weinberg A; Tomco M; Lia E
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 222():465-474. PubMed ID: 29908477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
    Talal ML; Santelmann MV
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02079. PubMed ID: 31972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Travel cost analysis of an urban protected area and parks in Singapore: a mobile phone data application.
    Jaung W; Carrasco LR
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110238. PubMed ID: 32148308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Greenspace use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population mobility study in the United Kingdom.
    Lemyre A; Messina JP
    Environ Res; 2023 Dec; 239(Pt 2):117360. PubMed ID: 37852457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adolescents' ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity.
    Veitch J; Salmon J; Parker K; Bangay S; Deforche B; Timperio A
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Jul; 13():73. PubMed ID: 27378077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Social media reveal ecoregional variation in how weather influences visitor behavior in U.S. National Park Service units.
    Wilkins EJ; Howe PD; Smith JW
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2403. PubMed ID: 33510327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detailed Assessment of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Parks According to Day and Travel Mode Based on Web Mapping API: A Case Study of Main Parks in Wuhan.
    Niu Q; Wang Y; Xia Y; Wu H; Tang X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Aug; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 30103514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A demand index for recreational ecosystem services associated with urban parks in Beijing, China.
    Sun R; Li F; Chen L
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 251():109612. PubMed ID: 31563053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "We actually care and we want to make the parks better": A qualitative study of youth experiences and perceptions after conducting park audits.
    Gallerani DG; Besenyi GM; Wilhelm Stanis SA; Kaczynski AT
    Prev Med; 2017 Feb; 95 Suppl():S109-S114. PubMed ID: 27575320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. COVID-19's impact on visitation behavior to US national parks from communities of color: evidence from mobile phone data.
    Alba C; Pan B; Yin J; Rice WL; Mitra P; Lin MS; Liang Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13398. PubMed ID: 35927271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The economics of roadside bear viewing.
    Richardson L; Rosen T; Gunther K; Schwartz C
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jul; 140():102-10. PubMed ID: 24726971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Park Visitors' Place Attachment and Climate Change-related Displacement: Potential Shifts in Who, Where, and When.
    Perry EE; Xiao X; Nettles JM; Iretskaia TA; Manning RE
    Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 68(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 33991206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A crowdsourced valuation of recreational ecosystem services using social media data: An application to a tropical wetland in India.
    Sinclair M; Ghermandi A; Sheela AM
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 642():356-365. PubMed ID: 29906727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing park popularity for mountain bikers, walkers and runners as indicated by social media route data.
    Norman P; Pickering CM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 249():109413. PubMed ID: 31472306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Urban Green Space Perception and Its Contribution to Well-Being.
    Kothencz G; Kolcsár R; Cabrera-Barona P; Szilassi P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 28704969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Understanding the impact of the installation of outdoor fitness equipment and a multi-sports court on park visitation and park-based physical activity: A natural experiment.
    Veitch J; Salmon J; Abbott G; Timperio A; Sahlqvist S
    Health Place; 2021 Sep; 71():102662. PubMed ID: 34517270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.