269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27641721)
1. Peak deformations in preparative supercritical fluid chromatography due to co-solvent adsorption.
Glenne E; Leek H; Klarqvist M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Oct; 1468():200-208. PubMed ID: 27641721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic investigations of peak deformations due to co-solvent adsorption in preparative supercritical fluid chromatography.
Glenne E; Leek H; Klarqvist M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2017 May; 1496():141-149. PubMed ID: 28366564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unravelling the effects of mobile phase additives in supercritical fluid chromatography-Part II: Adsorption on the stationary phase.
West C; Lemasson E
J Chromatogr A; 2019 May; 1593():135-146. PubMed ID: 30803789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A closer study of methanol adsorption and its impact on solute retentions in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Glenne E; Öhlén K; Leek H; Klarqvist M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Apr; 1442():129-39. PubMed ID: 26979267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The adsorption of methanol on reversed phase stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Kazmouz MY; Rédei C; Felinger A
J Chromatogr A; 2021 Sep; 1653():462386. PubMed ID: 34274884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic investigations of peak distortions due to additives in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Glenne E; Samuelsson J; Leek H; Forssén P; Klarqvist M; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Jun; 1621():461048. PubMed ID: 32204879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of co-solvent fraction, pressure and temperature effects in analytical and preparative supercritical fluid chromatography.
Åsberg D; Enmark M; Samuelsson J; Fornstedt T
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Dec; 1374():254-260. PubMed ID: 25499060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Method developments approaches in supercritical fluid chromatography applied to the analysis of cosmetics.
Lesellier E; Mith D; Dubrulle I
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Dec; 1423():158-68. PubMed ID: 26553956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of high concentrations of mobile phase additives on retention and separation mechanisms on a teicoplanin aglycone stationary phase in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Raimbault A; West C
J Chromatogr A; 2019 Oct; 1604():460494. PubMed ID: 31488292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chaotropic Effects in Sub/Supercritical Fluid Chromatography via Ammonium Hydroxide in Water-Rich Modifiers: Enabling Separation of Peptides and Highly Polar Pharmaceuticals at the Preparative Scale.
Liu J; Makarov AA; Bennett R; Haidar Ahmad IA; DaSilva J; Reibarkh M; Mangion I; Mann BF; Regalado EL
Anal Chem; 2019 Nov; 91(21):13907-13915. PubMed ID: 31549812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the competitive adsorption of sample solvent and solute in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Rédei C; Felinger A
J Chromatogr A; 2019 Oct; 1603():348-354. PubMed ID: 31164229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usual, unusual and unbelievable retention behavior in achiral supercritical fluid chromatography: Review and discussion.
Lesellier E
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Mar; 1614():460582. PubMed ID: 31604584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insights into chiral recognition mechanisms in supercritical fluid chromatography V. Effect of the nature and proportion of alcohol mobile phase modifier with amylose and cellulose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) stationary phases.
Khater S; West C
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Dec; 1373():197-210. PubMed ID: 25482039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of CO
Asokan K; Naidu H; Madam R; Shaikh KM; Reddy M; Kumar H; Shirude PS; Rajendran M; Sarabu R; Wu DR; Bajpai L; Zhang Y
J Chromatogr A; 2017 Dec; 1530():176-184. PubMed ID: 29162234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of an achiral supercritical fluid chromatography method with ultraviolet absorbance and mass spectrometric detection for impurity profiling of drug candidates. Part I: Optimization of mobile phase composition.
Lemasson E; Bertin S; Hennig P; Boiteux H; Lesellier E; West C
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Aug; 1408():217-26. PubMed ID: 26195034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a novel method for polar metabolite profiling by supercritical fluid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.
Konya Y; Izumi Y; Bamba T
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Nov; 1632():461587. PubMed ID: 33059177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of ionic additives on the elution of sodium aryl sulfonates in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Zheng J; Taylor LT; Pinkston JD; Mangels ML
J Chromatogr A; 2005 Aug; 1082(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 16035365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peak distortions arising from large-volume injections in supercritical fluid chromatography.
Dai Y; Li G; Rajendran A
J Chromatogr A; 2015 May; 1392():91-9. PubMed ID: 25798867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulated molecular-scale interaction of supercritical fluid mobile and stationary phases.
Siders PD
J Chromatogr A; 2017 Dec; 1527():97-104. PubMed ID: 29106964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of sample solvents on retention in packed column supercritical fluid chromatography].
Lu F; Liu LL; Wu YT
Se Pu; 2000 Mar; 18(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 12541595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
