167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27643488)
1. Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag?
Majid MH; Meshkat B; Kohar H; El Masry S
BMC Surg; 2016 Sep; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27643488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Port site metastases a year after initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Should the use of retrieval bags during laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the new gold standard?
Petryshyn N; Dražić T; Hogendorf P; Strzelczyk J; Strzałka A; Szwedziak K; Durczyński A
Pol Przegl Chir; 2021 May; 93(6):61-65. PubMed ID: 36169533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total 5-mm port approach: a feasible technique for both elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Bender K; Lewin J; O'Rourke H; Hugh FC; O'Rourke N; Hugh TJ
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Nov; 88(11):E751-E755. PubMed ID: 29687556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of retrieval bag in the prevention of wound infection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it evidence-based? A meta-analysis.
La Regina D; Mongelli F; Cafarotti S; Saporito A; Ceppi M; Di Giuseppe M; Ferrario di Tor Vajana A
BMC Surg; 2018 Nov; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 30453917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study.
Christoffersen MW; Brandt E; Oehlenschläger J; Rosenberg J; Helgstrand F; Jørgensen LN; Bardram L; Bisgaard T
Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3239-45. PubMed ID: 25612547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of bag extraction to prevent wound infection on umbilical port site wound on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial.
Comajuncosas J; Hermoso J; Jimeno J; Gris P; Orbeal R; Cruz A; Parés D
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):249-254. PubMed ID: 27177957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Umbilical port versus epigastric port for gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
Kulkarni AA; Sharma G; Deo KB; Jain T
Surgeon; 2022 Jun; 20(3):e26-e35. PubMed ID: 33888427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative port-site pain after gall bladder retrieval from epigastric vs. umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Siddiqui NA; Azami R; Murtaza G; Nasim S
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 22449831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrieval of Gallbladder Via Umbilical Versus Epigastric Port Site During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Clark MC; Barratt OA; Taktak S; Subar D; Henley N
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2019 Oct; 29(5):321-327. PubMed ID: 31033631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience.
Romanelli JR; Roshek TB; Lynn DC; Earle DB
Surg Endosc; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1374-9. PubMed ID: 20039073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.
Balachandran B; Hufford TA; Mustafa T; Kochar K; Sulo S; Khorsand J
World J Surg; 2017 May; 41(5):1246-1253. PubMed ID: 28058471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy.
Zullo F; Venturella R; Raffone A; Saccone G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 May; 5(5):CD013352. PubMed ID: 32374421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW
Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel single-incision surgical platform through a standard 15 mm trocar: initial experience and technical details.
Broderick RC; Omelanczuk P; Harnsberger CR; Fuchs HF; Berducci M; Nefa J; Nicolia J; Almadani M; Jacobsen GR; Sandler BJ; Horgan S
Surg Endosc; 2015 May; 29(5):1250-6. PubMed ID: 25149635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incisional hernia rate may increase after single-port cholecystectomy.
Alptekin H; Yilmaz H; Acar F; Kafali ME; Sahin M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Oct; 22(8):731-7. PubMed ID: 23039699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retained gallbladder secondary to retrieval bag rupture during laparoscopic cholecystectomy-A case report.
Huynh R; Magdy M; Saliba L; Loi K
Int J Surg Case Rep; 2019; 59():101-106. PubMed ID: 31125787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.
Pan MX; Jiang ZS; Cheng Y; Xu XP; Zhang Z; Qin JS; He GL; Xu TC; Zhou CJ; Liu HY; Gao Y
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 19(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 23372363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review.
Migliore M; Arezzo A; Arolfo S; Passera R; Morino M
Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4716-4727. PubMed ID: 29943057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of gallbladder retrieval from an epigastric vs. umbilical port on trocar-site complications A prospective randomized study.
Kaya C; Bozkurt E; Yazici P
Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():326-329. PubMed ID: 29051399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-port cholecystectomy maintains safety and feasibility in benign gallbladder diseases: a comparative study.
Lee SC; Choi BJ; Kim SJ
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25053130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]