141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27643518)
1. Early Experience of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Uterine Disease.
Gutierrez AL; Binda ML; Ramos JG
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 38(9):450-455. PubMed ID: 27643518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.
Gomes MTV; Machado AMN; Podgaec S; Barison GAS
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 29364368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Sendag F; Zeybek B; Akdemir A; Ozgurel B; Oztekin K
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 24376016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes.
Sendag F; Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozdemir A; Gunusen I; Oztekin MK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 24530696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of perioperative complications and influencing factors of complications in 1 000 cases of robotic gynecological surgery].
Huang XT; Ji M; Zhao Z; He NN; Li Y; Xu PL; Zhang JF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions' preliminary experience.
Bogliolo S; Mereu L; Cassani C; Gardella B; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Babilonti L; Delpezzo C; Tateo S; Spinillo A
Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 25231021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of postoperative partial bladder filling after minimally invasive hysterectomy on postanesthesia care unit discharge and cost: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Moawad G; Tyan P; Marfori C; Abi Khalil E; Park D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):367.e1-367.e7. PubMed ID: 30639089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Riemma G; Pasanisi F; Reino A; Solazzo MC; Ronsini C
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(2):. PubMed ID: 36837612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.
Perutelli A; Domenici L; Garibaldi S; Albanesi G; Baroni C; Salvati L; Salvati N; Cecchi E; Bottone P; Salerno MG
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Feb; 26(4):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 35253179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?
Carbonnel M; Moawad GN; Tarazi MM; Revaux A; Kennel T; Favre-Inhofer A; Ayoubi JM
JSLS; 2021; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 33879990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Tang FH; Tsai EM
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():1827913. PubMed ID: 28373977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.
Cela V; Freschi L; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Tana R; Pluchino N
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2638-43. PubMed ID: 23392975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
