140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27643518)
21. Robotic hysterectomy using the Vessel Sealer for myomatous uteri: technique and clinical outcome.
Hoste G; Van Trappen P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():241-4. PubMed ID: 26454809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.
Sunkara S; Guan X
Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):414-416. PubMed ID: 35691722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Gynaecological robotic surgery at a state hospital - our own experience.
Kadioglu BG; Kumtepe Y; Baran FS
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(9):495-499. PubMed ID: 30318576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Single-Incision Hysterectomy Outcomes With and Without Robotic Assistance.
Zhang Y; Kohn JR; Guan X
JSLS; 2019; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 31892789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Saceanu S; Cela V; Surlin V; Angelescu CM; Patrascu S; Georgescu I; Genazzani A
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 23790783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications.
Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic single-site surgery in benign gynecologic diseases: Experiences and learning curve based on 626 robotic cases at a single institute.
Yoo HK; Cho A; Cho EH; Kim SJ; Shim JE; Lee SR; Jeong K; Moon HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1885-1892. PubMed ID: 32686302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Mendivil A; Rossi E; Hanna R
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):585-593. PubMed ID: 19701039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Gynecologic robotic surgery and our initial experience].
Pilka R; Dzvincuk P
Ceska Gynekol; 2010 Dec; 75(6):512-7. PubMed ID: 27534006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Maylard incision in gynecologic surgery: 4-year experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
Manusook S; Suwannarurk K; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S102-7. PubMed ID: 25518301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.
Eddib A; Danakas A; Hughes S; Erk M; Michalik C; Narayanan MS; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Gynecol Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 24803837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimizing the total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure for benign uterine pathology.
Malzoni M; Perniola G; Perniola F; Imperato F
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 May; 11(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 15200777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy: Analysis of 500 cases in a single institute.
Akazawa M; Lee SL; Liu WM
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Oct; 15(5):e2026. PubMed ID: 31310418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca].
Vásquez-Ciriaco S; Isla-Ortiz D; Palomeque-Lopez A; García-Espinoza JA; Jarquín-Arremilla A; Lechuga-García NA
Cir Cir; 2017; 85(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 27320647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
