These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27643527)

  • 1. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.
    Payne BR; Stites MC; Federmeier KD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1839-1857. PubMed ID: 27428778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Fennell AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1032-46. PubMed ID: 23106372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Kornrumpf B; Niefind F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1374-91. PubMed ID: 27167402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 26752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of load on spatial attention depends on preview: Evidence from a reading study.
    Ghahghaei S; Linnell KJ
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():115-123. PubMed ID: 29763697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictability and parafoveal preview effects in the developing reader: Evidence from eye movements.
    Johnson RL; Oehrlein EC; Roche WL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):973-991. PubMed ID: 29620378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
    Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
    White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading.
    Zhou W; Wang A; Shu H; Kliegl R; Yan M
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):729-740. PubMed ID: 29435825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.