1104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27644057)
1. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
Awal DH; Mills C
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A North American perspective of content and quality of websites in the English language on childhood-onset lupus erythematosus.
Cutler C; Peng T; Stinson J; Tucker L; Boneparth A; Klein Gitelman M; Moorthy LN
Lupus; 2018 Apr; 27(5):762-770. PubMed ID: 29256340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
