416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27645215)
1. Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior.
Cornelissen TH; Võ ML
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):154-168. PubMed ID: 27645215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object-Scene Information.
Coco MI; Nuthmann A; Dimigen O
J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):571-589. PubMed ID: 31765602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.
Wu CC; Wang HC; Pomplun M
Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():10-20. PubMed ID: 25199610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of scene and object orientation on the scene consistency effect.
Lauer T; Willenbockel V; Maffongelli L; Võ ML
Behav Brain Res; 2020 Sep; 394():112812. PubMed ID: 32682913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the Semantic-Inconsistency Effect in Scenes Using a Continuous Measure of Linguistic-Semantic Similarity.
Damiano C; Leemans M; Wagemans J
Psychol Sci; 2024 Jun; 35(6):623-634. PubMed ID: 38652604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semantic Scene-Object Consistency Modulates N300/400 EEG Components, but Does Not Automatically Facilitate Object Representations.
Chen L; Cichy RM; Kaiser D
Cereb Cortex; 2022 Aug; 32(16):3553-3567. PubMed ID: 34891169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disrupted object-scene semantics boost scene recall but diminish object recall in drawings from memory.
Bainbridge WA; Kwok WY; Baker CI
Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1568-1582. PubMed ID: 34031795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of semantic consistency and perceptual features on visual attention during scene viewing in toddlers.
Helo A; van Ommen S; Pannasch S; Danteny-Dordoigne L; Rämä P
Infant Behav Dev; 2017 Nov; 49():248-266. PubMed ID: 29028583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ObScene database: Semantic congruency norms for 898 pairs of object-scene pictures.
Andrade MÂ; Cipriano M; Raposo A
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3058-3071. PubMed ID: 37488464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.
Draschkow D; Wolfe JM; Võ ML
J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):10. PubMed ID: 25015385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anchoring visual search in scenes: Assessing the role of anchor objects on eye movements during visual search.
Boettcher SEP; Draschkow D; Dienhart E; Võ ML
J Vis; 2018 Dec; 18(13):11. PubMed ID: 30561493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying task-related gaze.
Walter K; Freeman M; Bex P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1318-1329. PubMed ID: 38594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional capture by incongruent object/background scenes in patients with Alzheimer disease.
Lenoble Q; Corveleyn X; Szaffarczyk S; Pasquier F; Boucart M
Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():4-12. PubMed ID: 30006000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrusive effects of semantic information on visual selective attention.
Malcolm GL; Rattinger M; Shomstein S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2066-78. PubMed ID: 27381630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of scene summary statistics in object recognition.
Lauer T; Cornelissen THW; Draschkow D; Willenbockel V; Võ ML
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):14666. PubMed ID: 30279431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps.
Pedziwiatr MA; Kümmerer M; Wallis TSA; Bethge M; Teufel C
J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):9. PubMed ID: 35171232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The functional arrangement of objects biases gaze direction.
Clement A; O'Donnell RE; Brockmole JR
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 31044360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic Attention Capture by Threatening, But Not by Semantically Incongruent Natural Scene Images.
Furtak M; Doradzińska Ł; Ptashynska A; Mudrik L; Nowicka A; Bola M
Cereb Cortex; 2020 Jun; 30(7):4158-4168. PubMed ID: 32198506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
