416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27645215)
21. Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics.
Nuthmann A; de Groot F; Huettig F; Olivers CNL
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217051. PubMed ID: 31120948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults.
Fernandes EG; Phillips LH; Slessor G; Tatler BW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):1954-1970. PubMed ID: 33748905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Revealing the Semantic Association between Perception of Scenes and Significant Objects by Representational Similarity Analysis.
Wang S; Cao L; Xu J; Zhang G; Lou Y; Liu B
Neuroscience; 2018 Feb; 372():87-96. PubMed ID: 29294340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The elephant in the room: Inconsistency in scene viewing and representation.
Spotorno S; Tatler BW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1717-1743. PubMed ID: 28967780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speed limits: orientation and semantic context interactions constrain natural scene discrimination dynamics.
Rieger JW; Köchy N; Schalk F; Grüschow M; Heinze HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 18248140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perception of semantic relations in scenes: A registered report study of attention hold.
Doradzińska Ł; Furtak M; Bola M
Conscious Cogn; 2022 Apr; 100():103315. PubMed ID: 35339910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):14.1-13. PubMed ID: 20377291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations.
Gronau N; Neta M; Bar M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):371-88. PubMed ID: 18004950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Scene Integration Without Awareness: No Conclusive Evidence for Processing Scene Congruency During Continuous Flash Suppression.
Moors P; Boelens D; van Overwalle J; Wagemans J
Psychol Sci; 2016 Jul; 27(7):945-56. PubMed ID: 27225219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Scene semantics involuntarily guide attention during visual search.
Hayes TR; Henderson JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1683-1689. PubMed ID: 31342407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differential processing of invisible congruent and incongruent scenes: a case for unconscious integration.
Mudrik L; Koch C
J Vis; 2013 Nov; 13(13):24. PubMed ID: 24273226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does object view influence the scene consistency effect?
Sastyin G; Niimi R; Yokosawa K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):856-66. PubMed ID: 25522833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. No evidence from MVPA for different processes underlying the N300 and N400 incongruity effects in object-scene processing.
Draschkow D; Heikel E; Võ ML; Fiebach CJ; Sassenhagen J
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():9-17. PubMed ID: 30261162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Consistency effects between objects in scenes.
Davenport JL
Mem Cognit; 2007 Apr; 35(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 17691140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. SCEGRAM: An image database for semantic and syntactic inconsistencies in scenes.
Öhlschläger S; Võ ML
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1780-1791. PubMed ID: 27800578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.
Josephs EL; Draschkow D; Wolfe JM; Võ ML
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():100-108. PubMed ID: 27270227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects.
Mack ML; Palmeri TJ
J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):11.1-11. PubMed ID: 20377288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures.
Underwood G; Foulsham T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1931-49. PubMed ID: 16987782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Semantic Relations between Visual Objects Can Be Unconsciously Processed but Not Reported under Change Blindness.
Ball F; Bernasconi F; Busch NA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2253-68. PubMed ID: 26244723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing.
Bonitz VS; Gordon RD
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 18804752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]