These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2764562)

  • 1. Evaluation of the 7-h membrane filter test for quantitation of fecal coliforms in water.
    Barnes R; Curry JI; Elliott LM; Peter CR; Tamplin BR; Wilcke BW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 55(6):1504-6. PubMed ID: 2764562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration in tropical waters.
    Santiago-Mercado J; Hazen TC
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 53(12):2922-8. PubMed ID: 3324970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid seven-hour fecal coliform test.
    Reasoner DJ; Blannon JC; Geldreich EE
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 38(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 42349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of fecal coliforms in water by using [14C]mannitol.
    Reasoner DJ; Geldreich EE
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Apr; 55(4):907-11. PubMed ID: 2499258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The seasonality of fecal coliform bacteria pollution and its influence on closures of shellfish harvesting areas in Mississippi Sound.
    Chigbu P; Gordon S; Tchounwou PB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2005 Aug; 2(2):362-73. PubMed ID: 16705840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
    Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of four membrane filter media in anaerobic-MF recovery of faecal coliforms from freshwater in Nigeria.
    Ogan MT
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1992 Aug; 73(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 1399909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of strains isolated as total and fecal coliforms and comparison of both groups as indicators of fecal pollution in tropical climates.
    Lavoie MC
    Can J Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 29(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 6883225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of standard and modified M-FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of fecal coliforms in water.
    Grabow WO; Hilner CA; Coubrough P
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Aug; 42(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 7025755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing.
    Noble RT; Moore DF; Leecaster MK; McGee CD; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2003 Apr; 37(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 12600392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anaerobic incubation of membrane filter cultures for improved detection of fecal coliforms from recreational waters.
    Doyle JD; Tunnicliff B; Brickler SK; Kramer RE; Sinclair NA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 48(2):324-6. PubMed ID: 6486780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linking on-farm dairy management practices to storm-flow fecal coliform loading for California coastal watersheds.
    Lewis DJ; Atwill ER; Lennox MS; Hou L; Karle B; Tate KW
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Aug; 107(1-3):407-25. PubMed ID: 16418926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of culturable fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli enumeration in freshwaters.
    Garcia-Armisen T; Prats J; Servais P
    Can J Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 53(6):798-801. PubMed ID: 17668040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods of enumerating coliforms after UV disinfection.
    Qualls RG; Chang JC; Ossoff SF; Johnson JD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 48(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 6508284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of BGB-MUG and LSTB-MUG in microbiological surveillance of recreational waters.
    Höller C; Havemeister G; Gundermann KO
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Dec; 198(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 9353533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observations on the anaerobic membrane-filter technique for coliform counts in Nigerian surface waters.
    Ogan MT
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Jun; 188(3-4):311-21. PubMed ID: 2757746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of modified H2S test for detection of faecal contamination in water.
    Pathak SP; Gopal K
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Sep; 108(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 16160778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-temperature membrane filter method for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria from chlorinated effluents.
    Green BL; Clausen EM; Litsky W
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Jun; 33(6):1259-64. PubMed ID: 327935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective detection and enumeration of fecal coliforms in water by potentiometric measurement of lipoic acid reduction.
    Jouenne T; Junter GA; Charriere G
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1985 Nov; 50(5):1208-12. PubMed ID: 4091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the hydrophobic-grid membrane filter procedure and standard methods for coliform analysis of water.
    McDaniels AE; Bordner RH; Menkedick JR; Weber CI
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 May; 53(5):1003-9. PubMed ID: 3606086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.