These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27646792)

  • 1. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings.
    Kim DY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):260-265. PubMed ID: 27646792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of different coping arrangements fabricated by dental micro-stereolithography: Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in metal copings.
    Kim DY; Jeong ID; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Dent Sci; 2018 Sep; 13(3):220-225. PubMed ID: 30895124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
    Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
    Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing.
    Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 28663024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
    Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloy copings manufactured by microstereolithography.
    Kim DY; Kim CM; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 9(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 28680548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
    Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
    Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of marginal adaptation of the incisor and molar Procera allceram crown copings.
    Pilathadka S; Slezák R; Srinivasan V; Ivancáková R
    Prague Med Rep; 2008; 109(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 19097392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting.
    Zeng L; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Wei B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25444279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods.
    Park JY; Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Bae SY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 27174406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and Internal Gap of Metal Copings Fabricated Using Three Types of Resin Patterns with Subtractive and Additive Technology: An In Vitro Comparison.
    Addugala H; Venugopal VN; Rengasamy S; Yadalam PK; Albar NH; Alamoudi A; Bahammam SA; Zidane B; Bahammam HA; Bhandi S; Shrivastava D; Srivastava KC; Patil S
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Sep; 15(18):. PubMed ID: 36143710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
    Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.