131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27647272)
1. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Tumor Disposition.
Bordeau BM; Polli JR; Schweser F; Grimm HP; Richter WF; Balthasar JP
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 35054865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unpaired deep learning for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI without AIF measurements.
Oh G; Moon Y; Moon WJ; Ye JC
Neuroimage; 2024 May; 291():120571. PubMed ID: 38518829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity analysis of an image-based solid tumor computational model with heterogeneous vasculature and porosity.
Pishko GL; Astary GW; Mareci TH; Sarntinoranont M
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Sep; 39(9):2360-73. PubMed ID: 21751070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arterial Input Function (AIF) Correction Using AIF Plus Tissue Inputs with a Bi-LSTM Network.
Huang Q; Le J; Joshi S; Mendes J; Adluru G; DiBella E
Tomography; 2024 Apr; 10(5):660-673. PubMed ID: 38787011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Data-driven mapping of hypoxia-related tumor heterogeneity using DCE-MRI and OE-MRI.
Featherstone AK; O'Connor JPB; Little RA; Watson Y; Cheung S; Babur M; Williams KJ; Matthews JC; Parker GJM
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):2236-2245. PubMed ID: 28856728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI estimation of vascular parameters using knowledge-based adaptive models.
Bagher-Ebadian H; Brown SL; Ghassemi MM; Nagaraja TN; Valadie OG; Acharya PC; Cabral G; Divine G; Knight RA; Lee IY; Xu JH; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Ewing JR
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9672. PubMed ID: 37316579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive tumor hypoxia measurement using magnetic resonance imaging in murine U87 glioma xenografts and in patients with glioblastoma.
Linnik IV; Scott ML; Holliday KF; Woodhouse N; Waterton JC; O'Connor JP; Barjat H; Liess C; Ulloa J; Young H; Dive C; Hodgkinson CL; Ward T; Roberts D; Mills SJ; Thompson G; Buonaccorsi GA; Cheung S; Jackson A; Naish JH; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2014 May; 71(5):1854-62. PubMed ID: 23798369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robust estimation of hemo-dynamic parameters in traditional DCE-MRI models.
Hansen MB; Tietze A; Haack S; Kallehauge J; Mikkelsen IK; Østergaard L; Mouridsen K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209891. PubMed ID: 30605459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative MRI of Gd-DOTA Accumulation in the Mouse Brain After Intraperitoneal Administration: Validation by Mass Spectrometry.
Tessier A; Ruze AJ; Varlet I; Laïb EMH; Royer E; Bernard M; Viola A; Perles-Barbacaru TA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 60(1):316-324. PubMed ID: 37811700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shape-based motion correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for quantitative assessment of renal function.
Liu W; Sung K; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122302. PubMed ID: 25471978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing Treatment Response Through Generalized Pharmacokinetic Modeling of DCE-MRI Data.
Kontopodis E; Kanli G; Manikis GC; Van Cauter S; Marias K
Cancer Inform; 2015; 14(Suppl 4):41-51. PubMed ID: 26327778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial for "Quantitative MRI of Gd-DOTA Accumulation in the Mouse Brain After Intraperitoneal Administration: Validation by Mass Spectrometry".
Geethanath S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 60(1):325-326. PubMed ID: 37776098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of olanzapine exposure in individual patients using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation.
Polasek TM; Tucker GT; Sorich MJ; Wiese MD; Mohan T; Rostami-Hodjegan A; Korprasertthaworn P; Perera V; Rowland A
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 84(3):462-476. PubMed ID: 29194718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the Utility of Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Model for prediction of Pharmacokinetics in Chinese and Japanese Populations.
Yu Y; Lin J; Muto C; Li Y; Mori Y; Mittapalli RK; Tse S; Liu J; Ge BK; Liu J
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(16):3718-3727. PubMed ID: 34790045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blind deconvolution decreases requirements on temporal resolution of DCE-MRI: Application to 2nd generation pharmacokinetic modeling.
Kratochvíla J; Jiřík R; Bartoš M; Standara M; Starčuk Z; Taxt T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jun; 109():238-248. PubMed ID: 38508292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability with reduced scan time using deep-learning-derived capillary input function.
Bae J; Li C; Masurkar A; Ge Y; Kim SG
Neuroimage; 2023 Sep; 278():120284. PubMed ID: 37507078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of the capillary level input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a deep learning approach.
Bae J; Huang Z; Knoll F; Geras K; Pandit Sood T; Feng L; Heacock L; Moy L; Kim SG
Magn Reson Med; 2022 May; 87(5):2536-2550. PubMed ID: 35001423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hierarchical Bayesian myocardial perfusion quantification.
Scannell CM; Chiribiri A; Villa ADM; Breeuwer M; Lee J
Med Image Anal; 2020 Feb; 60():101611. PubMed ID: 31760191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
